Ok so rather than making mental health supports better and removing th stigma of having mental health issues we just blame the ability for people to have access to data about themselves. Sounds like the parents and the system failed the poor kid. They were going to keep trying to kill themselves unless they actually were given the help they needed.
Canada
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
- Maple Music (music)
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
It's terrible that this happened, but I think a docs notes from a 4 day stay don't make an accurate full picture of the persons underlying issues. So it would be difficult to diagnose from that event alone, and the other diagnosis may have been more accurate.
I guess it depends on if she had follow up care after the incident.
I think being in that sort of state is going to make anything you read from the doc come in as a negative bias. Parents really should be consulted as FOI is handed over, so they can discuss together.
Most parents would be googling terms the same as this girl was.
A better solution is for physicians to be open about what they're writing/typing ... and offering the patient an opportunity to read - and discuss - everything right then and there.
That's what I was taught by my prof in university in BSW.
Agreed
Sounds like she was just looking for a reason if this was the second attempt. She would have found another if not this one.
She was looking to understand what was written in the hope she would see light at the end of the tunnel.
Unfortunately afaik not one province pays physicians/psychologists to sit with a patient (for as long as it takes) to discuss anything.
And that is the failure of our healthcare system.
The FOI wasn’t the issue, it was the contents. Doctors should understand that patients can get this info and always be very careful about what they include.
Since doctors/staff communicate to each other in a shorthand, and it would be very difficult to make all that internal communication written in an accessible way. We would likely need a separate team of people transcribing and adding context to all the notes.
What might be a good first step is freeing up healthcare capacity to respond to patient's inquiries. After that, if we can set up some way of communicating the available resources to the person who FOI's the medical records, they can get in touch if they have questions.
Poor girl. Rest in peace.
I didn't even know that was possible. /goes to FOI own medical records
You probably don't need to. You can just access it via health gateway.
She may have spared herself a large amount of pain and agony and made a rational choice by dying. Many people with borderline personality disorder struggle for decades in misery and then end things decades later. The limited pleasure in those decades may not be worth the immense pain many feel. Perhaps she was highly rational and made an autonomous decision to terminate her suffering.
The problem isn't open information, the problem is they actively concealed information from her and didn't list possible treatments, leading her to be shocked when she read it. Psychiatrists need to be open with patients and not hide things in records hoping they aren't discovered by patients. She could have been discharged with something listing rule-out diagnosis and treatments for each one.
Psychiatrists also overly emphasize a dogma of brains being unable to change because it's more profitable to have lifetime patients, and this shapes how patients think about their possibilities. If an expert says you're always going to be broken, very few will challenge that.
Most psychiatrists are fucking quacks. I'm firmly of the opinion that the state should just allocate every man, woman and child $50 a month for person-centred therapy. Not trash like CBT or EMDR.
I'm very curious, what makes you call CBT and EMDR trash?
To be clear, this is just my opinion, and it's based on my experiences with psychiatrists as someone with pretty severe PTSD and other mental health issues.
Neither of those approaches tackles underlying emotional issues. They're popular because they give an easy-to-follow framework for "treating" very complex emotional issues. CBT is especially bad IMO, because it's more like teaching people how to mask and distract themselves from the effects of emotional issues rather than actually resolving them.
EMDR is like a "one neat trick" approach to tackling trauma, as if moving eyes around is some sort of magic spell to reverse trauma. In my experience, trauma is treated through reprocessing traumatic memories, and while EMDR does focus on reprocessing memories, it's a brute force approach, rather than a careful and measured approach, where emotional issues are slowly and steadily unpicked at a pace which is comfortable to the client.
Fair enough. I'm sorry those weren't helpful for you, I also found CBT to be less helpful than DBT and family model therapy.
I know a lot of trauma-exposed professionals that EMDR has been life-changing for, so I was really curious where that opinion came from. I think it has a lot of merit- like that one study that demonstrated the Tetris effect is helpful for reducing PTSD after a critical incident. A good professional won't move to EMDR until the client is ready to tackle the memories, I know for some it's been 6 months before talking about the original issue that caused them to seek out therapy. Every time you recount the traumatizing event it can retraumatize, so tackling it too soon (or needing to go through it over and over so workers comp can pay for the therapy you need after getting traumatized at work) is dangerous.
EMDR absolutely can be used by professionals, but where I live, it is used exclusively and very rushed. You are given a pre-allocated block of, say, six sessions, where you are expected to pretty much immediately get into the traumatic memories from the first session, and if you are resistant, you're told that you are wasting time.
That's why I hate EMDR, because it is held up as the "evidence-backed" method and thus professionals are functionally forced into rushing it, because the insurance provider won't pay for the likely months or years of therapy it takes to do therapy in a safe and healthy way.
Again, just from my own personal experience and that of my friends who have been through it.
Emdr has one of the best records out there. What is your basis for calling it trash?