this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025

320 points (99.1% liked)

News

33337 readers

1584 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

320

Luigi Mangione hearing tests legality of evidence in healthcare CEO murder case (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Alleged gunman faces nine charges including second-degree murder in New York state case

Luigi Mangione is due to appear in Manhattan state court on Monday for the first day of a potentially weeklong proceeding to weigh the legality of evidence gathered during his arrest after the killing of a prominent healthcare executive.

Mangione was apprehended last December in the murder of senior United HealthCare figure Brian Thompson last December. In addition to state-level charges, he faces a Manhattan federal court case.

Thompson’s brutal slaying on the streets of New York city triggered an intense manhunt for the killer, but also sparked an outpouring of anger at the practices of the US for-profit healthcare industry. Since his arrest Mangione has attracted some enthusiastic supporters, both online and at his court appearances.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 105 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Mangione’s legal team has repeatedly pushed for the exclusion of evidence gathered during his arrest at an Altoona, Pennsylvania, McDonald’s restaurant on 9 December 2024. They have claimed that police, who came to the fast-food eatery based on an anonymous tip, did not immediately apprise Mangione of his constitutional rights.

Mangione’s lawyers have argued that because he was not apprised of his rights, his statements to police should not be permitted in court. They also argue that evidence taken during his arrest should be barred, saying they conducted a “warrantless search” of Mangione’s backpack.

This is the crux of the issue.

Ever since the start I've been saying he was a suspect and they were tracking him based off of illegally obtained evidence. The whole tip was BS. Some random person (most likely cop or fed) told a fast food worker there was a reward and to call it in, then just left.

They needed an excuse to say they found a suspect, because they found him illegally. It's actually standard procedure called "parallel investigation".

But even if the call holds up, they fucked up all the evidence gathering.

I really think he'll get off on a technicality and trump will try to jail him anyways keep the wealthy happy

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

The way I see this going is

Mangione wins his initial case on the issues you highlight.

Theres a big legal slapfight.

Ends up in front of the supreme court.

Trump makes a public statement about how dangerous people like Mangione need to be found guilty and executed.

Shortly after the statement, the Supreme Court abruptly declares Mangione guilty.

Trump holds a public execution within a month. Possibly profiting off it by selling tickets to his billionaire backers.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

SCOTUS doesn't (normally) rule on guilt, they rule on the legal questions raised in the appeal, and send cases back down to be finished.

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

(normally)

Doing a lot of heavy lifting there

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

cause SCOTUS has been so normal the past 10 months, amirite

also i think he missed the whole "Trump publicly says he needs to be guilty, and SCOTUS immediately declares guilty" aspect

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Trump got dementia he isn't going be able to say shit. But wish he would he tank the GOP for life. Lugi is popular even with Maga.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) (1 children)

Can the Supreme Court overrule a jury? Doesn't he have a right to a jury trial? Can Mangione be convicted if no jury is willing to do it?

Not that constitutional rights have ever stopped Trump.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 53 minutes ago

If theres no one willing to follow the law, then nothing can be held accountable.

as you see with the trump admin. Does whatever it wants, with almost impunity, because they have corrupted the entire system to get rid of all checks and balances.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago

It's actually standard procedure called "parallel investigation".

The usual jargon is "parallel construction," in case somebody wants to look it up.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

because they found him illegally

Remind me again on what illegal method(s) were suspected to be used?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 43 points 6 hours ago

I think GP is alleging that the feds used NSA spy shit to locate Mr. Mangione at the Pennsylvania McDonalds through his burner phone.

But... It is a violation of federal law to spy on an American like that. So the feds have not admitted to that. Instead, they manufactured an anonymous tip, based on legally obtained surveillance video from New York, in order to have a legal reasonable suspicion to question Mr. Mangione.

And then the local cops who responded fucked it up anyway by blocking his path of retreat, which is a functional arrest, and then not Mirandizing. And they also searched the backpack before they had any probable cause to do so, and after they had removed it safely away from Mr. Mangione. Without PC, the cops may search the backpack or Mangione for weapons only (the infamous stop and frisk), but they cannot search the backpack insides if they have removed it away from Mangione. The backpack is no longer a threat at that point

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago

NYC is covered with cell snoopers....

Very very accurate snoopers, if he had a cell phone they'd have done that quickly without a warrant. And once they had his number from that, they could track him anywhere.

It's also one of the highest camera densities in the world, if there wasn't a phone then they likely tapped into every camera and ran facial recognition, again without a warrant.

But that's just the stuff we know about. A CEO was shot on the street, that's too close for the oligarchs so I wouldn't be surprised if they got the government to use the top secret shit that's supposed to just be for terrorists. Stuff we couldn't even think of, but might hear about a decade from now once it's no longer state of the art.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 5 hours ago

Jail? The orange turd has been pushing for execution since day 1 of the case.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 73 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

My man is innocent. Was not even there.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 39 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Luigi was with me the whole time.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 32 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

You're a liar.

He was balls deep in my wife at the time this supposed murder took place.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like ThePyroPython is your wife

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

🤫

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Lucky woman.

[–] tenchiken@anarchist.nexus 10 points 5 hours ago

Confirmed. I saw you watching them bone down while I was peeking through the window. Looked pretty fun, not gonna lie.

Nice house btw, and hot wife. You should be proud.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago

You lucky bastard

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Luigi is actually Sam Reich.

“I’ve been here the whole time.”

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Now that's a loop-de-loop!

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 38 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't look remotely like the guy in that original mugshot they were flashing around.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 hours ago

Right? This has bothered me from the beginning. He's not the guy in the footage who shoots Thompson, and it's obvious. But they need someone to take the fall as an example, to protect the rich.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 hours ago

He was eating dinner with me in Estonia the evening that CEO died. He only flew back to the US after that.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 67 points 5 hours ago

Cops were so thirsty for a conviction they completely broke the chain of custody on their "evidence". The whole thing should be thrown out

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 45 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

Thompson’s brutal slaying on the streets of New York city

Gtfo

[–] NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This BRUTAL ASSASSINATION of a poor little innocent ceo who definitely didn't profit on the corpses of thousands of people who were denied healthcare specifically because of his own intentional policies. This precious baby ceo was MORDERED in COLD BLOOD by this bloodthirsty ~~mass~~ murdering ~~immigrant~~ ~~minority~~ who hated him because FREEDOM and the BRAVE and BOLD decision of the ceo to allow poor people to be able to CHOOSE to die via paperwork ~~as a weapon~~. Surely this ceo who's name we can't find for some reason is smiling down on his beloved healthcare industry from the heaven that definitely exists. We hope the ultra powerful and scary ~~mass~~ murderer Luigi Mangione gets the JUSTICE the people of this country are clamoring for.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 hours ago

It was just a corrective market force.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, it was as brutal as any other shooting. Do cops shooting kids ever get described as "brutal"?

It's not like he was beaten to death with a tire iron, or denied treatment and left to a slow and agonizing death that also leaves your family in ruins.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

Meanwhile our president bragged on the campaign trail that he could stand in the middle of a NYC street and shoot someone and not lose any voters. We have federal agents brutally slaying innocent people on streets across the country while being treated like heroes.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How are the court hearings going for the cops that murder family members?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

Whathhearings?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The slaying wasn’t that brutal

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

A clean, point blank shot to the head is just about as un-brutal as it gets, as far as non-consensual deaths go

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 hour ago

Consensual Death would be a good band name.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 6 points 1 hour ago

you're not wrong.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 22 points 6 hours ago

He’s so hot, OMG

The only crime here is that he is not my husband

[–] flamiera@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 49 minutes ago

A CEO gets killed - the law, the police, the government are all out in droves to find who done it.

Your relative, a friend, your child even gets killed - eh, chances are likely you could get a cold case or not the desired results you were hoping for when the sentencing comes around. Oh and those thoughts and prayers.

It cannot be anymore clear as day as to who is pocketing the authority to do their bidding. Try and tell me with a straight face that the justice system is in favor of the people.

[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (9 children)

Can someone help me understand? It honestly sounds like he really did it but very well could get off on a technicality which to me is fine. I've had so many loved ones kicked off health care during terminal diseases and I despise for-profit model of the industry.

But it really seems like he did it, yet I see so many people questioning that. I'm just curious why that is.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 35 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Basically it's people saying:

Prove it

Because the government cant/won't say how they are so sure it's him

Couple that with how the wealthy never face consequences in our justice system due to their ability to pay money to lawyers.

And the fact that people want this to be decided by the letter of the law isn't extreme by any means, it's literally the point of law. And why people are (rightfully) outraged that they're trying to include terrorism charges.

It's just the cops fucked up so much, they're not going to be able to legally prove anything.

It's OJ all over again

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Difference is OJ murdered his ex wife he regularly physically abused and her lover.

Luigi wasn't there to begin with. He was chilling at some other dude's house the whole time.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

People are questioning it because the initial CCTV pictures of the murderer do not match Mangione's features. They look similar enough for it to be pulled in as evidence - and further supported by the items confiscated from him during his arrest, but then again people are questioning the legitimacy of those things too - but the differences are visible enough for even a mid tier lawyer to argue that the CCTV recording is not of their client.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

He is just a fall guy because they were determined to punish someone for the crime of daring to fight back against the ruling class. Just the claim that he was found with the murder weapon and a manifesto proving motive is enough to conclude that.

Even the most insane of murderers don't carry around everything needed for conviction while out for lunch days later.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 11 points 5 hours ago

In addition to some alleged incongruity of the evidence, I think a lot of people actually think he did it but they want him to get away with it/don't think what he did was wrong, and throwing mud in the water is a way to show support for him, albeit a somewhat disingenuous one.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

sounds like he really did it but very well could get off on a technicality

This is a suppression motion for unlawful search and seizure. To call this man's 4th amendment rights a "technicality" is some Law and Order copaganda bullshit.

These suppression motions are already very difficult to win. Mr. Mangione will have to show not only that his rights were violated, but also that the cops would not have found the evidence through a different, legal means. So if he does win, it will not be "on a technicality." It's just the system ensuring that everyone's constitutional rights are respected.

[–] wooffersyt@lemmings.world 8 points 5 hours ago

He didn't do it because I did.

Looks like I'm going to get away with it, too ;)

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments