this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
61 points (94.2% liked)

Selfhosted

53315 readers
1039 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/31326102

Since it is not designed for individual selfhosters, I'm wondering if any groups are actively attempting to run it together? Idea sounds cool, but I'm wondering about practical execution.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world 125 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You may want to change the title and include the word "protection"...

[–] thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 4 days ago

I was about to start my lucrative career in DDoS but, alas, I've been thwarted.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Doesn't really make sense for self hosting. Filtering the traffic is pointless if the traffic just completely overwhelms your internet.

Also generally self hosters aren't running bgp with their own asn.

Holy setup batman. Was thinking it was going to be another container I spin up, but it's enabling kernel modules, needs IOMMU, needs a ton of setup and then it looks like you still have to compile it? For now at least that's above my needs

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The first? Wasn't LOIC open souce?

[–] kiol@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago

Probably, that is simple what it says on their github

Seems like this system relies on defending from well-defined entrypoints to the network. I'm not sure how a group of enthusiasts could use this unless they centralize their systems.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Imagine a federated system that allows everyone to host this and everyone can vote on a designated target

Ticketmaster is being a dick? Vote! Ticketmaster is now ddossed until it makes hard changes to its policies and brings prices down to like 10% of what it is today

Boeing continues to focus on money only, not safety? Ddos until it changes

The Cheeto is murdering innocent people again? The entire world will ddos everything US until he's removed.

I know this won't ever happen, but I see this as potentially useful in making the world a better place for everyone

[–] rollin@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not sure if this is a joke, but if not this software is to help protect *against* ddos attacks, not for running them 😂

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

The title also had me confused.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 5 points 4 days ago

it's called Gatekeeper, and you think it's a project hosted on github for DDoSing people?

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

What you're talking about has existed for decades at this point. Most grey/black hat forums rightfully ban collective ddos tools when they see them. Turns out that the difference between duplicating a copyrighted work, and actively attacking a private server are vastly different, legally speaking, and get prosecuted a lot more forcefully when found.