this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
120 points (96.2% liked)

Science Memes

17507 readers
1968 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Explanation: Top left is a Taylor series, which expresses an infinitely differentiable function as an infinite polynomial. Center left is a Fourier transform, which extracts from periodic function into the frequencies of the sines and cosines composing it. Bottom left is the Laplace transform, which does the same but for all exponentials (sines and cosines are actually exponentials, long story). It seems simpler than the Fourier transform, until you realize that the s is a complex number. In all of these the idea is to break down a function into its component parts, whether as powers of x, sines and cosines or complex exponentials.

Edit: I'll try to explain if something is unclear, but... uh... better not get your hopes up.

[โ€“] AliSaket@mander.xyz 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It seems simpler than the Fourier transform, until you realize that the s is a complex number.

Oh, look at that hornet's nest. I wonder what happens if I poke it

As someone who worked with system modelling, analysis and control for years... I do think the Laplace transform is easier to work with ๐Ÿ™ˆ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[โ€“] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on why without getting us all stung to death?

[โ€“] AliSaket@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Basically two things: 1. Complicated operations in the time domain like convolutions become simple operations in the frequency domain. 2. It is way easier to handle complex numbers and do analysis with them than with explicit frequencies to the point where some things like stability and robustness can be judged by simple geometry (e.g. are the eigenvalues within the unit circle) or the sign of the imaginary part.

EDIT: I forgot the most important simplification of operations: A derivative in the time domain, becomes a simple multiplication by s in the frequency domain. So solving Differential Equations of the system's dynamics becomes pretty easy without having to go back into the time domain explicitly.

[โ€“] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is, but conceptually it's a lot weirder than the Fourier transform, whose idea at least is very straightforward. I mean, when doing Laplace transforms you do have to assume that int(e^tdt){0}{โˆž}=-1. I'd definitely rather use the Laplace transform, but you couldn't pay me to explain how that shit actually works to an undergrad student.

[โ€“] AliSaket@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Basically the assumption is that the signal x(t) is equal to 0 for all t < 0 and that the integral converges. And what is a bit counter-intuitive: Laplace transformations can be regarded as generalizations of Fourier transformations, since the variable s is not only imaginary but fully complex. But yeah... I would have to brush up on it again, before explaining it as well. It's... been a while.

[โ€“] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What kind of work do you do?

I'm in the process of wrapping up my degree and I work a lot with signals and controls. I agree that Laplace is much less of a headache than Fourier.

[โ€“] AliSaket@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

I was at the intersection between mechanical and electrical engineering as well as computer science. And worked in/with (electric) mobility, agriculture, medical/rehabilitation tech., solar energy, energy grid, construction and building tech. As well as some very limited stuff with economics. And I intentionally chose my study courses to be able to work in multiple areas and inter-disciplinary. My latest work is more on the business and management side of things and less technical, though.

What are you studying and what direction are you hoping to head in?

I understand some of these words

[โ€“] mech@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago

They should have cancelled this series instead of Rome and Firefly.

[โ€“] Zuriz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Taylor... You fear to go into those series. Euler delved too greedily and too deep. You know what they awoke in the depths of the number line...

[โ€“] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Added an explanation comment. Should've probably done that sooner.

[โ€“] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Ah yes.... it's crystal clear now!