this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
493 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
4176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“I think what a CEO does is maybe one of the easier things maybe for an AI to do one day,” he said. Although he didn’t talk specifically about CEO functions that an AI could do better, Pichai noted the tech will eliminate some jobs but also “evolve and transition” others—ramifications that mean “people will need to adapt.”

Pichai’s comments come as other tech CEOs have also predicted the coming of a new era of chief executive automations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman previously said AI will someday do his job better than him, adding, “I will be nothing but enthusiastic the day that happens.” Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna, also said in a post on X earlier this year that “AI is capable of doing all our jobs, my own included.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How is an AI chatbot going to eat a business lunch?

[–] sepi@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] massacre@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Isn't that just repeating what OP said?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Tbf the person they would eat the lunch with is also a chatbot girlfriend thing now.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

You’ve never fed bologna sandwiches to a paper shredder?

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m sure there are many jobs AI is not capable of doing but some CEOs probably do a bad enough job that an AI chat bot could probably do better.

I know we like to dump on CEOs all the time but a good CEO does not seem like one that could be replaced by AI, certainly not by what is currently being hyped. There are just a lot of highly visible companies with CEOs who aren’t actually very good. I suspect the dysfunction of publicly traded companies and the goals of Wall Street investors (or other nations’ equivalents) frequently not aligning with a good long-term health of a company has a strong influence on this.

And of course these guys will be happy to have AI replace them; they’ve already made boatloads of money and think they’ll be able to keep that going even if they lose their job.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Being a good CEO is 95% about social networking; creating and maintaining trustworthy relationships with others who will provide you with good support. AI can't do this, as it's a truly human thing.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago

What about when everone they're networking with are also AI chatbots?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 40 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

You don't even need AI. Just pay staff less and charge customers more, and give the stolen money to shareholders. Ta-da! That's the CEO's job done.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago

Become the shareholder and pay yourself ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 14 hours ago

Because upper management is less checked, they make a lot of human choices, such as keeping a lot of bullshit job positions open as garden hermits (there for scenery, to look busy).

AI tasked with actually increasing profits may run the business better than their human counterparts.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

Hype up vaporware. Be unprofitable but keep on hyping to draw in investors and inflate stocks and give yourself an inflated salary and sell off stocks periodically.

If get lucky enough vaporware eventually becomes a viable company or it goes bankrupt but its fine you already cashed out along the way. Yay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 25 points 23 hours ago

Something that consistently makes bad choices with little more than random probability? You don't say

[–] somtwo@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago

The job of a tech CEO:

  • Chase trends
  • Mass layoffs in time to make the quarterly reports look better
  • FOMO
  • ???
  • Profit!
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

AI could replace billionaires.

AI is uncaring and unfeeling, so wouldn't care if it was taxed appropriately.

[–] Jinarched@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 hours ago

Indeed, a LLM can certainly spout bullshit on social media.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 14 hours ago

Hate to add to this.

He's saying it to heat up the topic.

These people liked the heaps of cheap good hardware after the dotcom crash, so now they want cheap good hardware, specialized.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 12 points 23 hours ago

You first, shithead

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for the day when a major company has their AI CEO absolutely tank the company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That’s more an indictment of how we believe human society should be run than an endorsement of AI tbh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

if it's so easy an ai could replace it than why are ceos the highest paid position in the company?

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Because job difficulty and job pay aren't correlated under capitalism.

The easiest job is to own assets. Not manage assets. Own them. Which is to say get your name on a title of a sufficiently large asset, and the money just rolls in while you sleep in bed. You sleep, your asset works. For a large enough asset this also provides the largest pay.

Owners need lieutenants to look after their assets. That's what a CEO is.

So why are CEOs so highly paid? Because if you do not, they will embezzle (steal) money from your asset since they control every aspect of your asset's daily functioning! So you need to cut the CEO in on the grift of being a big asset owner.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

When chatgpt first came out and my CEO scrubbed my entire devision while giving zero bonuses yet having the most profitable year I wrote a prompt for a speech and it was practically verbatim. There's zero need for a CEO aside from maybe needing a fall guy with a golden parachute.

Subject: Q2 2023 Quarterly Update: Record-breaking Profits, Strategic Realignments, and Compensation Adjustments

Dear esteemed stakeholders,

I am thrilled to present to you the second-quarter update, brimming with noteworthy achievements and strategic developments that have significantly impacted our organization's performance. Despite operating in a dynamic and highly competitive landscape, we have delivered outstanding financial results that surpass any previous decade's records. I am excited to share these details and provide insight into the exceptional growth we have experienced in recent months.

Financial Highlights:

In Q2 2023, we witnessed a meteoric rise in our profitability, with net earnings reaching unprecedented heights, outperforming any comparable period over the past ten years. The diligent efforts of our teams, coupled with robust market conditions, synergistic acquisitions, and optimized cost structures, have paved the way for this remarkable achievement.

(Prompt outcome, probably could be more jargon heavy with chatgpt5!)

Strategic Realignment:

Our success can be primarily attributed to our relentless pursuit of strategic realignment initiatives across multiple fronts. By strategically refocusing our core business lines and leveraging our distinctive competencies, we have effectively capitalized on emerging market trends while fortifying our position as an industry leader.

Our investments in cutting-edge technology and digital transformation initiatives have empowered us to unlock new opportunities and drive operational efficiency. The implementation of data-driven analytics has yielded insightful decision-making capabilities, enabling us to optimize resource allocation and enhance overall productivity.

Product Portfolio Optimization:

Our product portfolio underwent a comprehensive review during Q2, resulting in strategic pruning and refocusing efforts. By prioritizing high-growth areas with maximum revenue potential and aligning our offerings with evolving customer needs, we have ensured a sharper competitive edge and amplified market penetration. This proactive approach has allowed us to streamline our operations while effectively positioning ourselves as a provider of innovative solutions.

Employee Recognition and Compensation Adjustments:

Regrettably, amidst these commendable financial achievements, it is imperative that we address a necessary adjustment to our compensation policies. While profits have soared, we have made the difficult decision not to award annual bonuses to our employees this year. This choice was made to safeguard the long-term sustainability and growth of our organization, considering the dynamic market conditions and the need for prudent financial management.

It is important to emphasize that this decision was not taken lightly, and we remain deeply committed to the well-being and development of our employees. Alternative avenues, such as performance-based incentives and recognition programs, will be explored to ensure ongoing motivation and engagement within our workforce. We firmly believe that nurturing a conducive work environment, coupled with career advancement opportunities, will continue to foster a culture of excellence and drive collective success.

Looking Forward:

Moving forward, we will remain steadfast in our commitment to driving sustainable growth, capitalizing on emerging market opportunities, and nurturing a resilient organizational culture. Our strategic initiatives will continue to prioritize innovation, operational excellence, and customer-centricity, ensuring our ability to adapt and thrive in an ever-changing business landscape.

I extend my deepest gratitude to each member of our organization, whose unwavering dedication and relentless pursuit of excellence have contributed to our resounding success. Together, we will navigate the evolving market dynamics and deliver sustainable value to our stakeholders.

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

[Your Name] CEO, [Company Name]

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 10 points 1 day ago

Of course.

If you have CEOs who manage multiple companies, it means being CEO is never a full time job.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

CEO’s job is to make business connections and get funding or contracts and stuff. People skills. LLM is really good at manipulation… If you give LLM a physical body, I would say it’s not that far-fetched…

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

AI can be such a good kiss ass, think of all the emotional suffering it'll save existing CEOs from having to endure kissing ass of people they hate.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Trash tier "article".

You might as well go for the original BBC interview, while looks to be only in audio for now.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

AI is advancing so swiftly, he said, that over the next 12 months the tech will be able to perform “complex” tasks and act as an agent on a users’ behalf.

I must be having the same deja vu for a hundredth time. What a clown.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Quick we need an answer from our CEO ASAP! Sorry currently AWS and Cloudflare are down so were SOL.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Is this an attempt to be "relatable" for the ~~slaves~~ employees?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

oh boy, another article about CEOs saying what “AI” could maybe do in the future. i’ll put this one in the pile with all the others

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No this one makes sense though. AI is great at being critically misinformed and making terrible decisions. Of all the things they claim AI can do, I think this one is the closest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If AI was truly worth anything then these tech ghouls wouldn't have to constantly hype it so much with click bait sound bites, and trying to shove AI features everywhere, even when it does not make much sense. These scum just want an excuse to keep laying off people to keep the bubble going so they can profitably exit while others are left holding the bag.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

Exactly. Altman's comment really speaks to this. It's almost implying, "hey you should welcome AI taking your job too! We are similar!!"

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

Never thought I'd hear honesty out of a C-Suiter

So, rehashing old ideas as if they were new, making decent products worse but charging more, lacking expertise and in-depth knowledge, using layoffs instead of good financial planning?

[–] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So, he practically says that being a CEO is trivial and mechanical.

How does that justify the insane pay then?

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Like the other person said, its never justified, its just they run the company so who can really tell them otherwise.

Shareholders maybe? but they won't rock the boat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AI guy wants his AI to run companies. Somehow, this is good for business and not a hostile control takeover by proxy.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

Oh how the turns have tabled.

[–] muxika@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In a better timeline, if that becomes true, then bring on the UBI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I agree AI could easily take on the role of the biggest dork in the company, which is largely what the CEO is.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I would love to see a study where they ask a 2024 AI for business decisions around things that happened in 2025. How much you want to bet it already can?

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

My quotes file for email signatures could replace most modern CEOs. The major qualifications are a cool name and being over six feet tall.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As much as I like hating CEO's... Aren't small company CEO's included? I feel that at least some of those people risked it all to build a company so they really shouldn't be bundled in here...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›