this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
404 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

76839 readers
1592 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All Kagi Search users can now flag low-quality AI content (“AI slop”) in web, image, and video search results. We will verify these reports using our own signals. If a domain primarily publishes AI-generated content, we will downrank it in Kagi Search and mark it as AI slop. If a page is AI-generated but the domain is mixed (not mostly AI), we will flag the page as AI-generated but will not downrank it.

For media results, images and videos confirmed as AI-generated, they will be labelled as such and automatically downranked on the results page. Users can also choose to filter out AI-generated media entirely.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] org2001@lemmy.radio 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I sincerely hope this works as advertised. People are quite sick of all the AI slop floating around ...

[–] tal@lemmy.today 21 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It shows up for me in the UI. I imagine that it works, and if it doesn't, it'll be debugged.

I think that the bigger question is whether the rate of spam website creation will outpace the rate of human flagging of them.

Kagi's process involves humans. I bet that the spam website stuff runs autonomously.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 22 points 22 hours ago

It runs autonomously to a degree, but a lot of these sites operate via posting a wide variety of content on the same domains, after those domains have previously gained status in search engines.

So for example, you'll have a site like epiccoolcarnews[.]info hosting stuff like "How to get FREE GEMS in Clash of Clans" just because previously they posted an article about cars that Google thought was good so they ranked up the domain in their ranking algorithm.

Permanently downrank the domain, and eventually they have to start with a new domain that, as is the key part here, has no prior reputation, and thus has to work to actually get ranked up in search again.

They're also going to be making this a public database, and have said they'll use it to train AI-generated content detection tools that will probably be better at detecting "AI generated articles meant to appear legitimate by using common keywords and phrases", rather than just "any text of any form that has been generated by AI" like other AI detection tools do, which would make them capable of automating the process a bit with regard to specifically search engines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (9 children)

I understand that running services costs money, and I've heard nothing but good things about Kagi. Can anyone here convince me it's worth the price?

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 32 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Eh, not really. I don't use google and I block trackers anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago

Your money, or your personal data, used for whatever damned purpose they choose.

That’s really the choice.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Running services costs money.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Can anyone here convince me it's worth the price?

Depends on what you want from them and your financial situation.

For me, yeah, it is. I want to pay a service fee and not deal with ads or someone logging, profiling, and trying to figure out how to monetize my searches. For me, the $10/mo for unlimited searches tier is what I want. I'm principally concerned about privacy.

I don't really take much advantage of most of the extra stuff they do other than the Threadiverse (they call it "Fediverse Forums") search lens and sometimes their Usenet search engine. Maybe this effort to suppress AI-generated spam websites will be nice, but have to see what happens, as I expect that the SEO crowd creating spam websites will also aim to adapt if it becomes sufficiently impactful to their bottom line.

If one of their extra features particularly fits your use case (say, the ability to fiddle with website priorities or blacklist or pin them in your search results) that might be valuable to you, but I can't speak as to that. I've seen people on here say that they really like that, but I don't use that functionality. Or the ability to easily download images in results from their image search if you're on mobile and are hitting something like pinterest, which is obnoxious on Google Images. Search bangs. Depends on what features you use and what each is worth to you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

They have a free trial. Convince yourself

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Which is perfectly fine. Not everybody needs to search for things day to day. There are some professions where search is important; law and software are two which are more relevant to me. Getting accurate, non hallucinating results is really important.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Is Kagi worth it? I mostly use DDG but every search engine I’ve tried is terrible now and rapidly getting worse by the day.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 17 hours ago

Absolutely. I've been using it for a month and it feels like Google, but before they enshittified. DDG was my previous goto search engine, but it's gotten really bad as well. Especially the aggressive keyword replacements drove me almost insane.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 10 points 17 hours ago

I enjoy it. They have a 100-search free trial so you can test it out for yourself. Between them down ranking sites full of trackers and allowing you to put your own preferential ratings on sites, I find myself getting the results I'm after so much quicker.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

I think so. I’ve been using it for over a year, as another poster said Kagi feels like Google did 15 years ago, before it destroyed itself.

Every time I use a search on another machine, my first reaction is “oh my god what is all of this shit everywhere? ads, spam, AI slop, shopping garbage, etc”, then I quickly realize it’s not my computer and that’s just what Google looks like now.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Try the free trial.

They give you enough searches for free that you should be able to figure out if there is value for you and the type of searches you do.

I find it a much better experience than Google which was what I was using before.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

Can we make an extension for Firefox and call it Sloppy-Stoppy?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's sucks not knowing anybody IRL interested in Kagi, I would love to try the 2-person account.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Wait, 2-person

Edit: oh, my dad and I both subscribe. I might even do the family plan and bring my wife into it.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I don't have a problem paying for a good service. I do have a problem having all my searches, video or article views linked to an account (with my payment data i.e. real name no less).

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 28 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then I have great news for you! Kagi accept bitcoin, does not validate email addresses (so you can register as fhhdsbgwg@hrjesbgwgw.com if that appeals to you), and they implemented privacy pass tokens that fully anonymize your searches. They also allows searching through tor!

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You still need to log in and link all your searches to each other. Those are trivial to de-anonymize you from.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html

When you enable Privacy Pass, instead of logging in with your Kagi account for each search, you use special cryptographic tokens. These tokens prove you have the right to use Kagi's services without revealing who you are. This means your searches can't be linked back to your account or to each other, providing an additional layer of privacy.

Obviously you lose some of the customization, but otherwise still a great service.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

These tokens prove you have the right to use Kagi’s services without revealing who you are.

Ok that sounds like an actual technical solution that - to be honest - I wasn't expecting here. Sadly, there's way too many processes involved for me to consider this for myself. Also, I am not transferring a single penny to the divided states of southern northern america until I run out of options - but that's just me.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just use their third party crypto payment service. It doesnt transmit any of this. Perhaps look this kind of thing up prior to insinuating these things are required for Kagi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They have a no-log, no-profile policy, which is why I use them.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I don't trust companies to not log my data. Not ever.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I stopped using Kagi because I felt their base tier didn’t include enough searches but if they keep adding good features like this I may go back.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Could improve it by calculating % on how much some site has published ai slop vs has not. This way it would promote those who avoid that shit and push offenders to the bottom or even let users just outright filter them.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago

This is much needed.

[–] jsheradin@fedia.io 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I wish there was a way to buy a Kagi subscription without AI assistant bundled in. I never plan to use it and it adds no value to me. I'd rather save the money and get a cheaper subscription.

[–] maccam912@programming.dev 6 points 4 hours ago

It makes sense it costs them something, but if it helps at all I've been paying for kagi since before the ai assistant stuff was included, it was the same price.

load more comments
view more: next ›