this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
953 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

18625 readers
917 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In August 2025, two nearly identical lawsuits were filed: one against United (in San Francisco federal court) and one against Delta Air Lines (in Brooklyn federal court). They claim that each airline sold more than one million “window seats” on aircraft such as the Boeing 737, Boeing 757, and Airbus A321, many of which are next to blank fuselage walls rather than windows.

Passengers say they paid seat-selection fees (commonly $30 to $100+) expecting a view, sunlight, or the comfort of a genuine window seat — and say they would not have booked or paid extra had they known the seat lacked a window.

As reported by Reuters, United’s filing argues that it never promised a view when it used the label “window” for a seat. According to the airline, “window” refers only to the seat’s location next to the aircraft wall, not a guarantee of an exterior view.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Change the naming from “window seat” to “bulkhead seat”…

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ought to call them skin seats since they're next to the planes skin

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

What's beside the aisle seats? Could it perchance be aisle on every single one? Hmm.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ZSSK seems to think the same:

collapsed inline media

No indication there's no windows (same for the single seat at the end) during selection. In the cart it even mentions the window. You just... gotta know the train already.
The image is stolen from this video, I don't have one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGXdAn54eAc

Hey, I also bought a ticket where the description said "seat next to the table", and there was none, though to be fair the diagram did not show it, just howering the mouse above the seat did. Also 1st class in that case.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

why do people even use this company? I dont think i have ever read anything positive about it.

[–] DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

They break guitars, for one. That's literally their company policy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Window seat?? No no, we said widow seat.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] FunkFactory@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In any case if you're on a flight longer than a couple hours you're not allowed to open them anyway, they make you keep em shut so people can nap 🙈 But it's fun to look out for the takeoff and landing. But the planes that tint the windows are the best.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It really depends on the airline and the time of day at the destination.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Nah you're still allowed to open them to smoke

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›