this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
447 points (99.1% liked)

Games

43361 readers
2609 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just minutes before it was set to deliver its financial results for the first half of its 2025-26 fiscal year, Ubisoft mashed the brakes on the whole thing, postponing the release of its results to an unspecified future date. The company also requested that European exchange Euronext halt trading of the company's shares and bonds from November 14 until the publication of its results.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 143 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait...you can just do that?

You can do whatever you want there, as long as you are ok with the penalties.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

You... can...

But its... kind of a really bad move, from the perspective of anyone with money, involved in Ubisoft.

This is roughly the equivalent of an unannounced, sudden bank holiday, you know, right before everything over the FDIC insured 250k gets cleaned out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (17 children)

I‘m looking forward to next year when AAA studios will continue to disappoint even harder while indie games flourish and gain market share. Maybe the AI bubble pops too. One can only hope.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Don't forget AA, doing pretty good too.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Then the AAA studios will use some of their Saudi cash to buy out the most prominent indie developers, only to slowly strangle their products

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 75 points 1 day ago

They know. They're done, and that's that.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 71 points 1 day ago (6 children)

There AAA games.

Then there’s one AAAA game.

Next must be the AAAAA game they’re working on. It’s an extraction shooter.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Roguelike Deckbuilder Extraction Shooter.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 57 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I remember when Ubisoft was a logo I liked seeing on my gaming screen.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 34 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Now it just looks like a flushing toilet.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can never unsee that now.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That logo quit being worthwhile seeing 15 years ago.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Yeah... I didn't say when that was. 👴

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 11 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, it was around the time when I was excited for the Assassin's Creed games.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 50 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The only possible explanation is that they didn't use enough AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t think video game companies should have gotten this big and/or complex…..

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Professional (as in they earn money, not skill level) Xers fuck everything up. (here, X is an arbitrary verb or a brand name)

My anecdotes: Youtube was good before professional youtubers became a thing (systemic problem, people are not the issue but the environment which breeds them), now it's attention economy and or one topic discussed for 50 minutes (a video explaining the same topic with the same intensity from 10 years ago is 2 minutes long)

Gamers were problematic but harmless, professional gamers caused betting pandemic (sponsored content).

Streamers were funny, professional streamers are sexy/deadly-sells-to-children.

I liked it when people were sharing stuff online because they were bored, and not because they were hungry.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 9 points 21 hours ago

The last line you said is top notch and sums it up well.

[–] meisterah@ttrpg.network 18 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'm noticing it happens with all companies.

They start out small and can't afford to pay businesspeople to figure out how to fuck over their customers as hard as possible.

Then, after the company is successful thanks to the hard work of the workers, the business-school people start applying in droves to make sure every company operates like gas stations across the street from each other.

It results in companies making decisions like having higher budgets for advertising than what they spend on actually making a product, because the data says it will make them more money and stupid customers keep reinforcing it.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until our culture stops valuing people based on their wealth. I have no hope for that to happen in my lifetime.

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

This exactly what happens when you rely on rhetoric, instead of you know, making games that people like.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 36 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

The only games in my Steam library that I can't play are Ubisoft.
Fuk Ubi. Forever. I would be happy if they went under.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

The Nestle of video games.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Ubisoft better get comfortable with not owning their own company.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ubisoft is a textbook example of what happens when you pin your companies revenue on a small handful of IPs and milk them to the absolute fucking limit. I like assassins creed, but I’ve played enough of them for the rest of my life. Make something new my dudes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 26 points 19 hours ago

Either way, he recommended that everyone "freak the fuck out for the next few days and speculate as much as possible until they announce something,"

Advice after my own heart. Freaking out and speculating are always the best move.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What did they screw up recently?

[–] the_strange@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The most recent release is probably Anno 117 which came out yesterday. While decently looking it's lacking features of the previous title (like coop mode and mod browser) with the promise they will be added later and is priced at around 60€ or 90€ if you want to gamble on the quality of the promised to be released DLC. They also relied on AI generated images in some of the assets used in the game instead of paying their artists. Optimisation for the game seems to be ok, but not great but it might be too early to judge that fully yet.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That seems like way too recent to have any impact, though. It wouldn't even have made it into their report data

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don‘t get why they’d cheap out on artists, a couple people drawing illustrations is surely not gonna balloon development cost - and arguably one of the easiest places to spot when it‘s AI slop. It‘s as if they think there must be gen AI stuff in the game somewhere or the game‘s worse or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Ubisoft trading community are coping to justify holding on to their tanking investments. It's a gambler doubling down on losing.

Christ, how the mighty Ubisoft has fallen. They will go the way of EA and become a spyware company for the decadent Arab royals. I'm just crying that Ubisoft made some of my favourite games growing up and look what they have done to my boy-- a rotting zombie 🥲

[–] MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's disappointing. I've been going through some of their older catalog recently and it just has a lot more passion behind it i feel.

AC Shadows felt like when i write an essay, where i get really motivated at the start, completely drop off and try to stuff the middle with as much as possible to reach the page count, then get motivated again at the end just to finish the conclusion. They always had their bugs, but lately it's felt soulless.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Uh-oh! Wait, you already said that.

Ruh-roh!

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

All you had to do was make good and fun games. How do you fuck THAT up???? Especially when you were already doing it.

And not to mention...

"Hey guys, what can we make that people really want?"

"I hear people all the time over the last decade asking for a new Splinter Cell game."

"Yeah, ok, Brad. We'll call that plan B... Every year with this asshole. Does anyone have any REAL ideas???"

Because fuck gamers, right, Ubi? Expedition 33 showed the world what current games makers can do when pricks in suits arent around to muddy the waters. The quicker UBI folds, and all that talent leaves to make something that they actually want to make the better.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They are also hellbent on infecting everything they touch with Denuvo malware. I haven’t bought anything of theirs in years for that reason alone.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I have a lifetime boycott of all things Ubisoft for this very reason. I bought game after game after game from the late 90's until early 2000's. 100% of them were legal purchases and with the CD in the drive... "please insert CD " error

Then I became the lead developer for gameloft.com and saw how completely incompetent the French leadership of the company is. Absolute morons to the highest levels.

Never another penny shall be conveyed to Ubi from my holdings.

edit: You wanna know what I'm talking about? Ok. They import the director from France. He does not speak English, he does not speak Quebecois, which is very different than Parisian French. He has no knowledge of the games industry whatsoever, but is a cherished family friend. He cannot communicate with anybody in written or verbal ways. He shows up for work at 10am and takes 2 hour coffee with other "leadership" and then lunch. Then he comes back from a 2 hour lunch, and him and come C-Level turnip laugh at his Billy Bass for 30 minutes. I am not making any of this up. This man installs a friend he met into the position of Executive Producer. The man's previous experience was managing an Esso gas station. No embellishment. So I'm the Sr dev and I'm the fucking acting director, account manager, game designer, executive producer, producer, technical producer, project manager, director of production, developer, creative director, QA lead, every god damned thing just to get some corny-ass games produced.

edit2: Laughing at a Billy Bass. A Billy. Bass. Singing. Fish. Laughing at it uproariously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

To be fair, they are too big.

They just have too many employees and costs. The way they’re organized, they’re stuck with gigantic budget, milquetoast, broad appeal games just to attempt sales they need to break even, with all the inefficiency that comes at that team size… unless they fire a ton of people and split up the rest.


My observation over the past decade is that “medium size” is the game dev sweet spot. Think Coffee Stain, Obsidian, and so on.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

For being too fat for their own good, tear the damn thing down.

collapsed inline media

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 15 points 19 hours ago

Maybe the dog ate their homework?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I've never heard of this happening before? I'm sure it has, but first time for me.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 11 points 15 hours ago

Oh it has, but the implications become clear when you look at the ones that did. Like evergrand...

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But how do the shareholders feel?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

This is what happens when you abandon Splinter Cell.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of very confused people here who think an earnings delay means ubi havent made much money. Cant say if they have or not, but if they havent thats still not a reason for this kind of delay

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

It's not that, it's the trade halt that points to something major (and bad for them) happening.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] regdog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

This is good news for everyone who is not an ubisoft shareholder

Sounds like their recent games that they claimed did so well probably didn't actually, and that's about to be a massive problem.

load more comments
view more: next ›