this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
906 points (99.5% liked)

News

33146 readers
4138 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 13-year-old student was expelled from a Louisiana middle school after hitting a male classmate who she said created and shared a deepfake pornographic image of her, according to her family’s lawyers.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

What kinda bum fuck school is this, I wanna say that but it's usually the affluent rich areas with fuckery like this going on

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Should put the porndog in jail

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

My thoughts:

  1. Re the girl: expulsion seems like a really over-the-top reaction on its face, especially for a girl hitting a boy—my 'information is missing' senses are tingling hard. Did she beat him especially severely? Does she have a track record of prior violence? I'd like to at least see the school's own stated justification for expulsion over a simple detention/suspension, etc.
  2. Re the boy: I'm guessing the body of the AI'd image was an adult's (I feel like the article would have definitely mentioned it if it was an 'age-appropriate' body generated with her head). Pretty sure there's no statute that covers this sort of thing specifically, but from the article, he "was charged with ten counts of unlawful dissemination of images created by artificial intelligence". Ten counts, but the beginning of the article uses "image" singular; I'm guessing this boy generated an image each of a bunch of his schoolmates, and she's the only one who reacted physically.

This article has a bit more info, mentions that a group of students were spreading the images amongst themselves, but this one is still very light (read: 0g) on the details of the expulsion or the rationale behind it: https://www.wdsu.com/article/louisiana-ai-images-student-nude-law-change-possible/69365110

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

he “was charged with ten counts of unlawful dissemination of images created by artificial intelligence”

It might mean he shared the image 10 times as each sharing is a chargeable offense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

While reading that headline, the last bit- I could hear the sound of squealing tires in my brain as I COMPLETELY switched opinion

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Should she have hit him? Probably not but I can understand the frustration at being abused and none of the adults willing to do anything about it. However, if they could expel her for hitting why hasn't the boy been kicked out for producing pornography? Surely that is several times worse than a mere hit? Why haven't the police charged the boy with sexual harassment?

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

When I read parish school I thought of course, but apparently that's just what they call counties in Louisiana. The boy should be charged along with anyone sharing but I remember way back in middle school days when one of my classmates had her actual photo circling around, I was completely clueless myself but I'd say at least 80% of the school had seen it afaik they only charged her because she took the photo herself (maybe they dropped them IDK) so I'm not holding out much hope.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›