this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
1187 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

76820 readers
1793 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google: "Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified. We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren't tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands."

Thank god. I would've ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Yea no, just don't change things. Things are good as they are without them trying to encroach further on our ownership of our devices.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

are they actually being rid of the "give us your id and pay to be certified to install" nonsense

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnowPenguin@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good news! But it doesn't change the fact that Google tried to do this in the first place.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Two steps forward, one step back

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

...is the easiest way to get a controversial change through.

Decide what you want to do, suggest something way more absurd, the go "oh we listened and we are only going to do [the original thing we wanted to in the first place]"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (8 children)

OP is either deluded or in bad faith.

This WILL go through, just slightly later to try to make less noise.

Linux phones are the only choice left.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jinarched@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Eh, I'm probably gonna ditch that smartphone thing anyways, at least for a while. Android becoming a closed-off garden was the last straw and I was kinda looking forward trying to go without a phone to test if I can adapt. I started leaving the house without my phone more and more and I kinda like it.

Sure, it's fun and convenient to have the Internet in my pocket. Heck, it's even required in some cases, but this digital mess we are currently in is too much for me. I remember how I was looking forward having one back then; I was really looking forward having acces to the Interney wherever I was, but nowadays I kinda miss being less conected from all the bullshit especially when outside.

I guess I could get a linuxphone one day if I miss having a phone (if I somehow manage to completely remove the smartphone from my life in the first place).

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If this flow existed once for disabling the entire feature permanently, I would be okay with it. But it seems like they are going to intentionally make installing any software they don’t get a piece of painful to install every time. That is not an acceptable compromise.

How about they drop the entire thing and keep it as it was and is?

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thank god. I would've ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

You would have ditched Android for ios if it were implemented?

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Not hardly. I've been looking for a reason to support Linux phones, and that would just have been the thing to do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›