this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
284 points (98.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12656 readers
1117 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

I think valve has the absolute worst skins market out there but their store is really good.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 20 minutes ago

Steam had been one of the good companies so far. Until they showed clear signs of enshitiffication, I will patronise Steam.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -1 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

So we're acknowledging it's a monopoly? Cool. Defense is still an acknowledgement. I've had the weirdest goddamn arguments with people insisting they'd never shop anywhere else, and if games aren't on there it's their own fault they're doomed... but how dare anyone use the m-word! Obviously that can only mean one seller with absolute control, like how Standard Oil owned all 85% of the market.

[–] Vinnyboiler@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

I still don't feel like it's a monopoly when there is nothing stopping developers from selling the game as a paid download off their own site. Players can even add that game as a non-Steam game and still get a mostly complete experience as if they brought the game from Steam. Companies selling their game on Steam was always a option and not a necessity.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›