this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
165 points (96.1% liked)

News

33088 readers
2733 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The deal, negotiated by a group of Democrats and GOP leaders, funds the government through Jan. 30. If it passes, it will still need to clear the House, which will likely take days.

WASHINGTON — Senators struck an agreement Sunday, projecting confidence that it will be sufficient to end the lengthy U.S. government shutdown, three sources with direct knowledge of the details told NBC News.

The agreement, reached by a group of Democrats who teamed up with Republicans, should have the necessary 60 votes to clear the Senate, these sources said. It would then need to pass the House and earn President Donald Trump's signature to become law and reopen the government.

Even if it has enough support to clear those hurdles, the process is expected to take days.

The agreement contains a “minibus” — three full-year appropriations bills that will fund certain departments like Agriculture through the end of the fiscal year next fall — and a continuing resolution to fund the rest of the government at existing spending levels through Jan. 30.

It would also fully fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, once known as food stamps, through next September, a major flashpoint in the shutdown.

The sources said the deal also reverses Trump’s attempted layoffs of federal workers during the shutdown through RIFs, or “reduction in force” notifications.

But in a major concession from Democrats, it does not include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. Allowing the funds to lapse would raise insurance premiums for millions of Americans unless they are extended. Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain, two of the sources said.

Even then, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said he won’t promise that the House will vote on extending the subsidies.

(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unrealizedrealities@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (6 children)

Love how the left is doing its usual run of hating how its side has caved, while missing the irony that the left caves every day by tolerating their right-wing neighbors for the scum they are. Like, newsflash, never mind the caving of a handful of democrats. There's nearly half a Senate and House full of the enemy, put their by your enemy neighbors, and their reps are the real reason we're in this mess, and the left is going to sit by and tolerate those voters rather than making their lives hell. Because the left is the "good guy," and lose everything because the left won't get their hands dirty. And the Right? They get their hands dirty, they suck, but they get their hands dirty, and that's why they're in power. Wake the fuck up. Now is not the time to be tolerant, peaceful, or moral. Fuck the idea of "Dems gotta be perfect while the Right gets to be assholes." Treat the right as scum to be removed just as they remove citizens with ICE. That is the proper way to view them.

Not some do nothing, pat yourselves on the back ass peaceful protest. Brian Thompson deserved his death. Charkie Kirk deserved his death. Aaron Danielson deserved his death.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

you seem to have a very different conversation than what the article is talking about.

[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago)

It's almost like I'm not referring directly to the article or something! 🙄 My response is referring to the left-wing posting around the news that tries to slam the reps who caved.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Why can't we do both things

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›