this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
29 points (69.3% liked)

Linux

10041 readers
605 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been seeing a lot of people trying to find the perfect Linux distro to replace Windows 10 with, now that its support is ending, and Ubuntu is usually the first name that comes up. It makes sense since it is stable, beginner-friendly, and has a huge community that makes getting started with Linux easier.

But as someone whose first Linux distro was Ubuntu, and who has used it for over half a decade across different PCs, I’ve realized it might not be the smartest choice anymore. Instead, Fedora Silverblue turned out to be exactly what I was looking for. Even if you are new to Linux, it might actually be the better option.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I've tried a few different distros that always seemed to have one issue or another, and they were all based on Debian. So I just tried Debian instead and it's good, I'm not sure what the other distros are adding.

[–] poinck@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

same, there is only one reason to get Ubuntu over Debian, if you have a Nvidia gpu, they make it easy to just work.

But, if you don't need cuda, I recommend an AMD gpu and stick with Debian or Fedora. It is trouble free.

PS: I will try immutable distros some day, pinky promise ^^

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Even then, if you're switching, just give installing drivers for Nvidia on Debian a go. If it doesn't work, just move onto the next distro

[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I’ve never tried silver blue, but I can confirm that fedora in general has a very good balance of “Just works” and “Tinkerability”

E: I’m a little worried about red hat with their history, but if something happens I’m totally prepared to jump ship to an ArchOS, probably endeavor or manjaro

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm more concerned with the current ownership.

Truly a shame, there are a few really talented and knowledgeable folks I knew at RH are no longer there. Even recently there was an RTO push(to drive people away) about a month ago, and then a round of layoffs just a few days ago.

IBM has an unfortunate history with acquisitions, and I fear RH will be just another footnote in a series of IBM mergers and acquisitions.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 5 points 7 hours ago

That's sad to hear

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If you go Arch-based, just go Arch at that point. It's beautiful.

[–] Durandal@lemmy.today 12 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

fedora's declaration that they're officially okay with including "ai" generated code in the project has me shopping around for a new distro. CachyOS seems like it's really soliid choice these days.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"AI code" is being added to the Linux kernel for years now.

Are you shopping for a different OS?

I am willing to bet more than 80 % of programmers nowadays have AI assistance. It works. It saves time. Code is still public, reviewable.

You can either accept the new reality or hide in the woods.

[–] murvel@feddit.nu 2 points 7 hours ago

But, but, AI, reeeeee!

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 8 points 6 hours ago

Its been downhill since compilers. People just script these days. No knolage of low level systems. Bring back assembly.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 3 points 2 hours ago

Oh come on, they added guidelines on how AI generated content has to be marked.

The alternative would be people committing their AI generated code anyway and just not telling anyone.