this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
620 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

76672 readers
2908 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, from his perspective, having nothing to lose (besides his soul, ofc, but that's for silly people πŸ™„), of course!

You think the Palantir CEO has a soul? You gaze into that orb once and it's game over

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Not MY Surveillance! YOUR Surveillance!

-Palantir CEO!

[–] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

No it's not

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Of course he does. But false dichotomy aside, China has a good chance "winning the AI race" anyway. Given their existing work, the investment they're doing in higher education, the additional internationally trained talent they get every year, and the industrial base that lets them make cheap energy and hardware, I think at the very least China has a decent chance to create equivalent tools at a lower price than whatever the US AI industry creates. If they come out with a competitive hardware and sell it at lower margins, along with free models as they already offer... I think a lot of firms and governments would opt for that instead of paying for NVIDIA and OpenAI.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago

Spoken like a true surveillance-state shill.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Look at this unfuckable loser. He's like if someone glued Steve Bannon's pubes to Steven Miller's head. "Let us destroy all freedom in the USA so China doesn't win the race to economically out-compete the USA" is as bullshit a justification as there has ever been for anything in the history of everything.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If any of you dumb fucks don't think we already live in a surveillance state, you are part of the problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know I’m supposed to be better than this, but what the absolute fuck is wrong with bro? His entire vibe is off. What the fuck is with that hair? Why is he calling everything baller? This is some Zuckerberg lizard person shit all over again a person who thinks that hair works and talking like that sounds fucking cool can’t be an actual human what in the weird ass shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 6 points 17 hours ago

Those are the only two options???

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 6 points 21 hours ago

what an absolute piece of human turd. most likely stinks like shit around him, every time he opens his mouth.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These things are completely orthogonal.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

You make Karp sad. Why won't you buy his profit-driven narrative?

seems like less of a threat than US bases surveillance/MOSSAD assisted tech.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How would a surveillance state even prevent that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

anything is preferable to people like you

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 13 hours ago

Alex Karp thinks people only care about one kind of surveillance. And he thinks he will alleviate our fears if he gives us a pinky promise not to surveil us in that one way.

That way is cheating.

He later brings this up again, saying that most surveillance technology isn’t determining, β€œAm I shagging too many people on the side and lying to my partner?” Your guess is as good as any as to what that’s all about.

Well, thanks for clearing that up, Alex. That was indeed my sole concern.

(The rest of the article is full of indecipherable quotes from Alex, which demonstrates you don't need to be smart to be rich.)

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AI race to the bottom. Ever thought of asking the people instead?

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί