this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
-34 points (20.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

38044 readers
718 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chavs were made up by a middle/upperclass newspaper in 2004 to paint the working class as all animalistic thugs. They never actually existed, and like with The Loch Ness Monster, the stories of run-ins with them were always too ridiculous to be true

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No... that culture of violence was very very real. The stories may sound ridiculous, but that's just because of how extreme that culture was.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Dirty tricks, MI6!

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I'm not saying that violent people don't exist. I was saying Chavs don't exist. Chav is a very derogatory synonym for a working class person and the middle and upper class people made Chavs up to paint the entire working class as violent and animalistic. The media made it sound like these mythical "Chavs" were everywhere and swarmed on people like hungry piranhas. I'd expect that to show up in violence statistics.

Much to the contrary, the rate of violence was sharply dropping around the same time "Chavs" were invented by the media. Doesn't that seem a little weird to you?

collapsed inline media

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Chav is not a term to describe a working class person - it's a term to describe a subset of youths who are pretty much feral.

By feral I mean aggressive and "antisocial" in the "are you looking at me pal" kind of response to eye contact. In essence, a youth whose primary strategy is to escalate to conflict by the shortest possible route in the hopes of winning status.

What that has to do with coming from an honest working family is beyond me!

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Hey, ignorant Yank here, and I'd like some clarification. Is chav the bri'ish version of redneck?

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not from the USA so I don't really have a clear idea on what a redneck is.

However, going from media representations (dodgy ground) I'd say no. There isn't the strong streak of racism, and the demographic is uniquely young for chavs (since most grow out of it).

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough. The racism isn't a necessary component to being a redneck but it is fairly prevalent. Rednecks don't outgrow it typically either. Thanks for the straight reply.

[–] kip@piefed.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

i don't know much about usa subcultures either but it might be somewhat similar to guidos? i'm not sure how well they are known for antisocial behaviour. the closest international comparison i can think of is russian gopniks

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago

No Not even close

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 23 hours ago

In my experience, Chav has never been used to describe a normal working class person. In Northern Ireland, we had our own variant "Spide" or "Smick" which were generally more tame. Less burberry more tracksuits

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Reply to edited chart - violence against adult was not as common. Violence against other kids however...

Also, 1995--2002 was peak chav ;)

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What is it with a bunch of bad takes being posted on this community recently

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because chavs existed. I saw them. My siblings saw them. There are various news reports. Not all working class people are chavs.

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe -3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Chav is a derogatory synonym for working class people, though. It was made up to demonize the working class. News reports can be made up or fueled by hysteria.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Aren't chavs the tracksuit wearing shitheads, like the thugs working for Eggsy's stepdad in the first Kingsman?

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe -3 points 22 hours ago

Most young working class people wear tracksuits. The "Chav" appearance is literally just your regular working class person, except they're normal people, not savages.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

What is your obsession with 'chavs'?

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago

Grew up in the era there were definitely chavs it wasn't a class thing either as a lot of them tended to be role-playing middle class kids who wanted to look hard as usual.

Walking through local shops and being challenged about which part of town you lived in or getting called a "greebo" all a day in the life of the era.

[–] kip@piefed.zip 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

there is a grain of truth in this. chav culture certainly existed and still exists in the south of england but they came in around 2000-2010 or so for much greater demonisation than their northern (scally) or scottish (ned) counterparts, likely due to UK media being concentrated in the south

the great chav danger was blown wildly out of proportion and i've no doubt the term expanded beyond the original sense of a sort of tracksuit/burberry clad antisocial petty criminal youth to include just about any working class kid in the minds of home counties handbag clutchers

so to say they never existed is false, and to say they never caused anyone any bother is false. but the middle class media confected version of them never existed in any great proportion either

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We called them "charvers" or "a charva" up north as long as i can remember in school , certainly well back into the mid 1990s. I'd not say it was a middle class term at all though, more sub-cultural within lower classes. Probably the more vocal alt-types used it as an insult/provocation to the more obnoxious trev/sharon types. There's a lot of subcultures and just different people within the lower classes especially at school. Middle class kids at school would keep their heads down and keep out of it for the most part. Upper class kids didn't exist - i assume they were away off in posh schools suffering whatever abuse leads to people like michael gove..

I'd agree that charvers were a small, but obnoxiously vocal, minority of the lower classes. Much worse at school though with kids being kids and all. But its also something people could grow out of in a few years, or just after a bit of cold turkey, more behavioural/immaturity than class.

You could probably also trace it back to things like football hooliganism - a fairly easily avoided minority - but not imaginary. Maybe the press latched on to it after most of the football firms were locked up and they needed to fill some column inches.

[–] kip@piefed.zip 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

good points, the inter class rivalry in particular. i think it's a reasonable guess that the term lost its more specific original sense when it escaped containment and got into the mouths of littlejohn et al but just saying middle class was reductive. sun/mirror hacks would have been in on the action too

i read about chav being derived from charva but never heard it said personally - i'm from the south though

re hooligans there's definite similarities but chavs lack the same kind of rallying point so were more dispersed. maybe some chavs got promoted to casuals

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course they exist, ya dummie! I'm working class and they definitely exist.

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe -2 points 23 hours ago

You mean other working-class people exist. Look up how much of the UK is working class.

[–] Modest_Toxic@feddit.uk 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I've always seen chavs as the tracksuit wearing, loads of kids, living off smokes, scratch cards and pot Noddles that sit around soaking up benefits. I know that nay not be the proper definition of chav but I'm not sure what else to call them

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

You just described the average working class teen. What the media calls "Chavs" look like ordinary working class people except with a demonic twist that doesn't exist.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

The commenter said 'soaking up benefits', I don't think the working class people would be looking like 'chavs' because many of them are going to and from work in uniform. Plus, you're essentially equating all working class people with chavs? So walking into a Tescos, every member of staff is a chav?

Is this déjà-downvote I feel?

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

Not snobish at all. And even i was scared walking threw fratton Portsmouth

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Roadmans are currently being made up. Kids wearing balaclavas wearing bomber jackets talking with a heavy London grime artist accent dont exist.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 23 hours ago
[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Back when roadman was just starting to become a term I had a friend who started calling himself one, he didn't like it when I told him it was just another version of a chav

[–] ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe 0 points 17 hours ago

Aren't Roadmen a Black sub culture while "Chavs" are a myth that was always portrayed as being white and working class?

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago

Nessie obviously be a 'ned' not a 'charva'.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

While I disagree with identifying the working class with 'chav', the origin of the word did start very much in classism and stereotyping (hence my deep disagreement with the term). A pretty good analysis in this article: https://eathealthy365.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-chav-in-british-culture/