this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
449 points (98.7% liked)

World News

50674 readers
3493 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum has said she will press charges against a man who groped her during a public appearance.

Mobile phone footage of the incident on Tuesday shows Sheinbaum speaking to a group of supporters on a street near the National Palace in Mexico City. A man approaches her from behind and attempts to kiss her on the neck and place his hands on her body.

"My view is, if I don't file a complaint, what will happen to other Mexican women? If they do this to the president, what will happen to all women in our country?" Sheinbaum said at a news conference on Wednesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ozzy@olio.cafe 153 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Mexico sues sexual predators, US elects them

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 48 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The difference between a third world country and Mexico

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago

Gangs are illegal in Mexico and corruption is something to be fought against

ICE gets 100k salary to beat up and kidnap people with masks in US

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 34 points 19 hours ago

A sexual predator in Mexico was emboldened enough to grope the president in front of reporters.

And E. Jean Carroll did sue (and won a settlement from) Trump for sexual assault.

Let's not do the "every nation is better than the US about everything now" thing.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 46 points 20 hours ago

As she should.

[–] curlywurly@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago

In capitalist America, president gropes you!

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 29 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

In another thread about this episode people were saying the entire incident was staged by her to distract from other news. I got downvoted to hell for suggesting that it was anti-woman to believe such a conspiracy theory rather than acknowledge that a woman got groped.

The fact that she’s pressing charges should put the conspiracy theory to bed. Why would she take it into a courtroom for more attention if it was just a stunt to manipulate the press that week? I’m sure someone will double down on conspiracy theories to come up with an answer to that question…

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Sexism is believing it is okay to grope a woman and commit sexual assault.

Casual sexism is automatically assuming a woman (in power or not) who brings legal action against someone for committing sexual assault is doing so for attention or some other false ulterior motive.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Yes, thank you. It’s less overt of an assault on women then physically groping them, but it’s perhaps more insidious, because an environment of ignore-and-excuse puts ALL women everywhere at risk

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

And its happening right here, right now. Fucking God damn. Sexism is still rampant in 2025.

[–] sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's infuriating. A woman can be sexually assaulted, on video, in front of hundreds of witnesses, and some people will still insist it didn't happen, or she staged it, or it was her fault somehow.

This is why we still need DEI. Jesus fucking Christ.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yep. If people don’t like DEI programs, they could always, you know, just treat women better.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's that #believeallwomen is a hard hill to die on. Any internet troll is a Google search away from proof that you shouldn't blindly believe all women. It just reminds me of when Joe Biden had some allegations against him, and he got caught between a rock and a hard place: believe all women, just not this one.

Instead of belief, it's about respect. Whether true or not, any accusation should be taken seriously and avoid sensationalism. It's also about understanding your role. It's easy for me to say all of this about a situation thousands of miles away; I have an infinitely small role. If it happens closer to home, to someone you know, belief may be a part of that role, but it still needs to come from a place of respect and understand of the situation. If religion is any example, blind belief doesn't help anything but fuel division.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

It’s not about blindly believing all women all the time. It’s about believing them by default, and as you say, taking them seriously. In this case they were willing to discard the evidence of their eyes in favor of some pretty far fetched conspiracy theory, and considered anyone who didn’t agree to be some naive idiot. And they paradoxically claimed to take sexual assault very seriously, while doing this. SMH

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Not dismissing the idea that it might be for real, but random man being able to grope the literal President sounds kinda sus.

I'm not super into Mexican politics, but doesn't she have guard on duty to prevent just that?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I’m glad you don’t automatically dismiss that she was actually assaulted (!!!) I mean that’s pretty much the bare minimum everyone should do. This was captured on video. You can view it for yourself. Her guards did intervene, just a step too late. That does not mean she staged it for attention.

But everyone would love to feel smart and come up with some alternative theory of what happened rather than contend with the sordid facts.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

She had guards with her. She was originally supposed to be driven around, but she decided to walk. Not sure how they got so close but this wasnt a planned trip.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Fucking disgusting, the audacity of that man is disgusting.

They should send him to America, he has solid change in a government position. /s

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 19 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The woman president of Mexico gets groped and Lemmy still manages to post 5 comments only about US politics. Why must you shoehorn in that shitty country into every unrelated topic on Lemmy?

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 23 points 20 hours ago

They are the neighboring county and the topic is sexual predators.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

it's the US defaultism, most users are from there, that bothers me too

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Send him to worst America

[–] peyotecosmico@programming.dev 8 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

You know it was staged, right? Everyone knows it's a distraction from this. It isn't the first time she does something to distract from the current events....

I know I'm going to get downvoted for this but it's infuriating to live in México and you can't criticize our government because all of you love that an empowered woman is in control.... Most of México is a mess right now, cartels are in control, just last weekend I had a trip to my mother's inherited grandmas house and in a small town and after a 6 hour trip we just went back because they control the town.

My mom said she rather lose her childhood home than our lives....

[–] daguma118@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?? You clearly don’t live in Mexico and just hear US propaganda/ Telemundo/ tv azteca which is the same.

  1. This wasn’t staged. Sadly there are men like this in Mexico
  2. carlos M. tragedy is begin blow out proportion by the media to decrease approval and have the elite funded parties rise again or use it as an excuse so the use can US can invade Mexico.

This shit happened way more in previous governments and never heard about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

As we all know, women are never assaulted and only use it for cover ups.

[–] peyotecosmico@programming.dev 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Dunno who said that, I didn't. Don't put words in my mouth.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

"Look, a woman is using this for benefiting herself, not to get any justice." Is what you argued.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Are the federales lacking resources or intent? That assassination was clearly a message, I admittedly don’t know a lot about Mexican politics but is it possible to defeat the cartels or is it a competition of monopoly?

[–] peyotecosmico@programming.dev 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Morena, her political party, is very friendly to the drug cartels, AMLO (our last president) went to greet Chapo's mom for example. He's the one that created morena.

His ideology was "let them work and they won't mess with you" .

[–] daguma118@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Idk why the quotations since this was never said.

Yes cartels (which are funded by the US) do have a big influence in Mexico, but no MORENA isn’t friendly to the drug cartel.

They understand that going into blood battles against them doesn’t improve it. ( which happened in previous governments) Instead they are targeting the root cause like:

  1. taking 11 million Mexicans out of poverty,
  2. increased salaries
  3. education grants
  4. infrastructure, etc.

their actual slogan is: “abrazos no balazos” which means hugs instead of bullets.

They understand that most don’t joins cartels out of fun, but need.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Reminds me of Benazir Bhutto as Prime Minister in Pakistan.

Her PPP party bombed Imran Khan's cancer hospital a day after he announced his own PTI party.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Does she not have security crew to beat them up?

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No body guards? How would someone even get this close (didn't see the video)?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

That was my question after seeing the video.... and it's mexico... no bodyguards? And please notice that I mean no offense to mexico and that I'm questioning this as a latin.

[–] Xanadu@feddit.online 2 points 3 hours ago

Were is Rodney Dangerfield when you need him..

load more comments
view more: next ›