this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
208 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26293 readers
2523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One social media user wrote that the hedge fund executive Bill Ackman "went from acting like Mamdani was going to import ISIS to extending a friendly handshake… in like six hours."

. . . Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman poured over $1.75 million into the mayor's race with a laser focus on stopping Mamdani, whom he often ambushed with several-thousand-word screeds on his X account, which boasts nearly 2 million followers. He accused Mamdani—a staunch critic of Israel—of "amplifying hate" against Jewish New Yorkers, while suggesting that his followers (which happened to include many Jewish New Yorkers) were "terror supporters."

Meanwhile, the billionaire suggested that the democratic socialist Mamdani's "affordability" centered agenda, which includes increasing taxes on corporations and the city's wealthiest residents to fund universal childcare, free buses, and a rent freeze for stabilized units, would make the city "much more dangerous and economically unviable," in part by causing an exodus of billionaires like himself.

In turn, Mamdani often invoked Ackman's name on the campaign trail, using him as the poster boy for the cossetted New York elite that was almost uniformly arrayed against his candidacy. In one exchange, Mamdani joked that Ackman was "spending more money against me than I would even tax him."

After Mamdani's convincing victory Tuesday night, fueled in large part by his dominant performance among the city's working-class voters, Ackman surprisingly did not respond with "the longest tweet in the history of tweets" to lament the result as some predicted. Instead, he came to the mayor-elect hat in hand.

"Congrats on the win," he told Mamdani on X. "Now you have a big responsibility. If I can help NYC, just let me know what I can do."

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (3 children)

One thing I like about Mamdani is that he clearly has contempt for these people, but also the self-control to keep it in plausible deniability territory.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 days ago

"I wish Andrew Cuomo all the best in his private life!"

Translation: Fuck off and never come back!

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 16 points 3 days ago

His victory speech last night was delicious.

I agree with your assessment.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 43 points 3 days ago

“Congrats on the win,” he told Mamdani on X. “Now you have a big responsibility. If I can help NYC, just let me know what I can do.”

How about give up all your wealth, Bill Ackman?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 days ago

But I was Told by Rich People they would LEAVE if Mamdani Won? WHY would they LIE to Me about Him?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like that people like Mamdani utterly baffle the rich. He has... integrity? How much does that cost? Concepts that are completely foreign to the wealth class.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Let's find out guy is not even in office yet.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Big City Politics.

Here comes the money.

[–] Airowird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago

Aye, I also read that as "Please tell me how I can bribe you"

Perhaps his life flashed before his eyes, as it should have. Epiphanies do occur.

wtf, pass the peyote.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To become a billionaire you have to be depraved. What behavior were people expecting from someone like that?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not only do you have to be capable of immoral actions to amass that much wealth, but having power has all sorts of neurological effects.

People who gain power become less capable of empathy. If you gave a "good" person that much money, they would be less able to think about how their actions hurt others.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm a bastard and if you gave me that much money I'd probably spend a disturbing chunk within a week get bored and then piss about funding archeologists. But I'm also autistic and think power is for bitches to the point that there's a solid chance I'd ban myself from living off said wealth.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is why the people we see who are billionaires are depraved.

Before any normal person became that wealthy, they would find ways to spread that wealth.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough, even my generally frugal old money ancestors didn't hoard wealth like these bastards. They preferred to etch their name in stone by financing the construction of libraries and historical societies, hell one bank rolled the start up for a volunteer fire brigade bank rolled a quarter of their budged for 50 years. I guess that's kinda the key difference between the billionaires and regular folks be they rich or poor normal humans want to do shit and not sit around like a bunch of boring ass dragons.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

I have often thought that if i got a bunch of money i'd make sure not to move house, quit my job or otherwise change my lifestyle. I'm also neurodivergent and quite devoted to avoiding ever excercising power and to ignoring authority as much as i can.

Realistically I suspect we'd get food delivered multiple times a day.

But of course i don't think me-without-a-billion could ever really know what me-with-a-billion would do.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The great thing about having a large, involved grassroots constituency is that you can always safely say no to these ghouls.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Ackman can sucl a big fat dick

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 days ago

Seize him by the means!

I guess that's getting a little eager

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

That's weird. I thought rich folks couldn't afford to live there anymore, with all those new taxes and whatnot.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I wonder if he's ever seen The Gentlemen?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Scaremongering ... That just reminded me.... Who thr flying F is Scaramucci? Anyone remember that boiled piss bag? Web searching....ah he got fired on the first go of mr orange.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Nah, too young. I'm gonna be dancing with the stars way before that guy.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The mooch? The unit of measurement for very very small amounts of time in the halls of power?