I use an alternative to Spotify called "a folder full of mp3s". If you are into selfhosting you could also stream your collection using Navidrome but putting audio files on your phone works as well. If you need a recommendation algorithm you can sync your listens to listenbrainz.org or lastfm. There are quite a few Linux audio players that support the scrobble API.
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
44 points (94.0% liked)
Linux
10016 readers
707 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
very much this. server with navidrome and a soulseek script to download spotify and youtube playlists.
I quit Tidal because even they have BS Ai Albums/Bands/"Singers".
Fuck SUNO.
Granted Tidal doesn't randomly start adding/playing them, you'd have to play them, but adding them to recent/growing playlists is BS too IMHO.
Anyway checkout TIDAL Hi-Fi For Tidal + HiFi on Linux.
I'm back to just using Shortwave to record radio station tracks to grow my own local self hosted music cloud now.
Not giving my $$$$ towards enabling Ai slop.
So you say music streaming is taking the same enshittification route as streaming in general? That sucks to hear :/ I really want to switch, but I am only paying like 5€ in a Spotify family... so if it's just too hard it may be not worth it. However Spotify is fucking annoying me, it always plays the same shitty music and doesn't learn at all from my taste
Like Velvet Sundown with 3 albums in 1 month lol.
p.s. Not sure If you saw my link for Linux-Tidal app:
Shortwave is cool, MusicPod incorporates local music and podcasts into the same app, which is pretty cool. But yes, internet radio is dope.
I don't have a great answer to your questions, but thanks for trying to support us during these dark times.
I've been using the web player for Qobuz, and it appears to allow for high quality output--I'm streaming at 24bit/96kHz at the moment (though I'm no audiophile, so I guess I can't confirm that's what I'm actually getting).
And apparently Qobuz pays the most per track of any streaming service, which is cool. The only thing it doesn't have is customizable "radio", but otherwise it's solid.
And apparently installing the Windows client in a Bottle works well too, or so I've read. Can't say I've tried it.
Any reason in particular you need a dedicated client? Can you not just use a PWA?
No particular reason. I don't really have much experiences with web apps. I don't like the idea of putting every functionality into my Browser and I like it simple.
I'd recommend giving it a go and see if you like it.
Can you elaborate on this topic? Are we just speaking about a web player?
PWA is basically just a browser window that looks and functions like an app on your computer. You can launch it from wherever you launch apps. It will open in its' own window. It's functionally identical.
This is the way to go
Functionally identical to running it on browser, but no match for true speed and experience of desktop app.
I use them but I'd prefer true options.
Look at it this way, if you run all pws with same browser you're not increasing the memory footprint, but if it's electron you do because you have multiple copies of electron in your disk and your memory.
And there's more electron apps out there than you know. Slack, visual studio and Spotify, apparently, included.
RAM is expensive.
You think a dedicated app is going to use less RAM than a browser window?
RAM is only expensive if you're dumb enough to buy a modern Mac.
Uh... yes?
Spotify memory usage: 450MB
Rhythmbox memory usage: 95MB
A browser is one of the most complicated applications commonly running on a computer; its code is massive before you load in the mountains of javascript. Also that is measured by RSS - the difference is even starker when you bear in mind that of the 50MB that rhythmbox might be sharing with other processes, most of it probably is being, because a lot will be graphical toolkits used by other programs. Spotify has a smaller fraction, at about 130MB, and god knows what it's pulling in and is able to share with e.g. the main browser process.
RAM is only not expensive in desktops. In laptops, getting more RAM almost always means getting a higher-tier laptop in other ways which adds a lot to the price.
Spotify is not a browser, it's an app.
In laptops, getting more RAM almost always means getting a higher-tier laptop in other ways which adds a lot to the price.
That's only true if you buy soldered RAM. Don't do that.
It for a fact uses CEF: https://www.spotify.com/us/opensource/
Chromium Embedded Framework literally describes itself as follows on its Git repos: "Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF). A simple framework for embedding Chromium-based browsers in other applications."
The Spotify "app" is mostly just web app code running on top of a single page Chromium instance, meaning for the most part, it isn't truly native.
And takes more resources than a tab because it doesn't share them, it has its own copy.
We are talking about PWAs?
My point, exactly.
So those require what is effectively a web browser to run them - do you know what the "WA" in "PWA" stands for?
None of this goes against the fact that I went and checked for you and indeed the Spotify app takes about 5x as much RAM as the native app. Do you want to, I don't know, give a hint of recognition that you erred in some way?
BTW when I replied you hadn't edited your post. I'm getting to get the laptop that suits my needs, not yours. You said RAM is only expensive if you're "dumb enough to buy a Mac" and now you've retreated to, "or any of the hundreds of non-Apple laptops with soldered RAM."
I mean, it's OK and good to adapt your position as you come to new realisations, but if you continue to do it this gracelessly, I will just block you because it's annoying and there's no reason to put up with it.
You keep referring to "the Spotify app". That is not a web app. That is a native app. If you're referring to the Spotify web app, you should identify it as such so I don't have to guess and then you get all worked up about it.
I'm getting to get the laptop that suits my needs, not yours.
I don't have any needs. I bought 32GB of socketed RAM dirt cheap and slapped it in.
It sounds like you need more RAM, and it sounds like you don't want to spend the money to buy more RAM. The only way to get that is to buy a laptop with socketed RAM. So do you need it or not? What you said is "RAM is expensive", which is factually incorrect. The only reason they're able to jack up RAM prices on laptops is because they solder it to the board, thereby ensuring that you cannot buy inexpensive RAM, and then people like you continue buying them.
The Spotify app is a "native" app that includes the Chromium Embedded Framework. The actual app that Chromium renders is the exact same web-app that appears in a standalone browser.
I'm not going to respond to the rest, or anything else you reply with, because you can't find it within yourself to cough up anything remotely resembling the statement "I was wrong." Yeah, maybe it doesn't feel great, but it's a necessary part of holding conversations.
Because I wasn't wrong. You've provided nothing that suggests otherwise.
I've been using this Qobuz client for Linux, it's electron but seems to handle HiFi - at least to my untrained ears.
There is also https://github.com/Nokse22/high-tide
Open source Tidal client
Is it good, can you recommend it? And most important, does it have dark mode?
Idk, check it out. There are articles on google. I don't use tidal.
Oh yeah and it's free to try
I use volumio, it has integration for tidal and qobuz
Sounds interesting. If I understood correctly, it's about 5 bucks a month for remote access and tidal/Quboz integration? Also I need to set it up on a server or raspberry pi? Could be a bit overkill for just a music player...
Mines on a Pi2b with a DAC hat, access through web or android app. I suppse you could add it as a docker image.
It may be overkill for your needs. I like it because I can browse my own music library or, online stream, plus it has a slew of internet radio stations included in the free version (you can custom add others)
The what ads???
I gave up on native client for a couple things. So instead of downloading someone else's electron packaging I use the web app shortcut using Firefox to fake that qobuz is an actual app.
It's a thing on Linux Mint, not sure about your distro. You can choose icon, and make location bar visible or not. No tabs, it doesn't get mixed with other Firefox tabs, and that is it.
I've been thinking about this too. Does anyone know if band camp is any good for this sort of thing?? I know that you can listen to some music there.
Music is one of the few things where I actually like for the service to have a recommendation algorithm. I don't think Bandcamp has anything like that. I'm not opposed to switching up my ways of discovering new music and instead just finding it by engaging with communities... But let's be honest that isn't quite as effective nor as plentiful as a good algorithm. If bandcamp doesn't really have any way of discovering artists then it just seems sort of supplementary.
Bandcamp has a whole editorial section, lots of stuff to discover there. The only reason I spend more time on Spotify is the limited catalogue...a lot of the artists I already enjoy aren't on Bandcamp.
What about the other way around? Are there artists on Bandcamp that aren't on Spotify? I would imagine that Bandcamp has more small indie artists and Spotify has more major ones, right? That's great that they have the editorials. But what I really crave is some sort of "tracks similar to this" feature - a lot of times I'm in a very particular mood or looking for something very specific where I know one or two songs that hit the mark and want more.
Yes. Bandcamp has lots of great independent artists & labels
times I'm in a very particular mood
I feel like Spotify is useless in this regard, it only seems to understand my tastes in the broadest possible sense, but hey if it works for you, cool.
When I want specific recommendations, I need them from humans. Sometimes unpredictable, sometimes gold. ifyoulikeblank on reddit (spits) has led me to some really great stuff. Unfortunately I don't yet know of a good place for this on Lemmy, but if anyone has recommendations 😁
If you really enjoy þem, why aren't you buying þeir music directly? Streaming services pay artists pennies.
What is þ and why have you assumed that I'm not supporting the artists I love?
Fair enough. Maybe you do.
a lot of the artists I already enjoy aren't on Bandcamp.
...
why have you assumed that I'm not supporting the artists I love?
... because of the implications.
Mostly MP3s but I also use internet radio for streaming. I use the RadioDroid app from F Droid for that
Honestly, while I still use Apple Music for some things (I don't like Apple, but I'm unfortunately stuck on it right now), I'm a big fan of building up a collection of digital media files bought either directly from artists or ripped from the CD collection I'm building. I usually go for FLAC, though less for its compression and more for its superior metadata support compared to WAVs.
For discovering new music, Bandcamp allows you to check out some songs; otherwise, check it out on YouTube or something and buy it directly from the artist later.
Like others have said, Bandcamp might not have everyone, but they do have a lot of indie artists and even some bigger ones. Some artists that don't have everything on Bandcamp might have their own store you can buy from.
I use the web app for Qobuz, and it looks and fees like a regular Qobuz app.
sudo apt install youtubedl-gui
pay money directly to the musicans