this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
171 points (97.2% liked)

politics

26293 readers
1948 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After entering the race largely unnoticed, the new mayor of New York City can expect to face serious scrutiny in office.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

serious scrutiny in office

That's okay, you can avoid scrutiny by eating McDonald's three times a day, ending every communication with THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER, and painting your face like a clown.

I'm sure he's picked up on these political "life hacks".

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those don't work in isolation though: you have to be a far-right psychopath (ie regular right wing) for them to work.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Can you even imagine having standards greater than demented, parasitic, criminally corrupt, malignantly narcissistic, pathologically lying, mentally-ill child rapist?

That would be crazy...

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

His life has already been combed through, one time he borrowed a table in college to use in a different room. He was a rapper and had a mustache for a while

What they actually mean is that, for years to come, they're going to ask him if he's extra sure he's not a terrorist in every single conversation

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I AM NOT A TERRORISM THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO RHIS MATTER

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He called a lady "auntie" that wasn't his biological aunt though

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Say he's brown without saying he's brown lol

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like every other culture uses familial terms for an extra layer of casual address, white people are the only ones that don't

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do. I know a ton of white people who do. My family does. This is true across family/friends ib multiple states. My kid calls our close adult friends uncle/aunt/gramma.

I guess some don't. I'm sure that's also true of some non-white people.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, because that's the norm for humans

I'm sure you could find specific subcultures elsewhere that don't do this, but it's the default everywhere else. It's not just close family friends or people you grew up with, any friend from a generation up is Uncle or Aunty

I'm sure there's a reason for it, and it's probably a very interesting one

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OK but saying white people don't do this is wrong

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 2 days ago

It's an exaggeration to illustrate a point... It's not literally true

But it is pointing at something that is true

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Not in NYC you can't

[–] Englishgrinn@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now that he's won and his victory was a landslide, this will be the most common strategy used by those that still care about appearing biased.

For every ranting lunatic on Fox News or in the White House, (and let's all let out a deep sigh over THAT Venn diagram), there will be another supposedly more reasonable person trying to blunt Zohran's momentum with "healthy skepticism". He can't do X. Y will be next to impossible. He has to compromise Z.

The thing is, that strategy can work. Public support is Zohrans best weapon, and it can be pulled through wearing people down. Get this young hotshot stuck in the mud and the shine might fall off real quick.

On the other hand, of Zohran pulls off a big win or two quickly, say in his first year or so, then he'll cement that anything is possible, destroy this line of attack and probably hold that office for 10 terms if he wants.

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This feels a bit different. I feel as though public opinion might be colored by, if not outright informed by, his ability to make Trump freak out and devote more and more resources to the "Zohran" problem. If the American public, who by now is totally convinced that Trump if wholly against their interests, sees the object of their suffering seem afraid, that's psychologically anchoring. This man makes your abuser uncomfortable = he is safe.

Even if he's stonewalled, Zohran can truly put forward a message that this admin cannot ignore, even if nothing gets done. Nothing gets done because of Trump and he can totally spin that in the same way that no one blames the dems for the shutdown.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If the American public, who by now is totally convinced that Trump if wholly against their interests

Mate. What rock are you living under? 40% of Americans blame the D's for the shutdown as of last week. 40% of new yorkers voted for the corrupt narcissistic predator yesterday.

You seem to be making the same mistake as the average D did in 2016 and 2024; acting as though you aren't up against a corrupt billion dollar fascist psychological warfare operation — run by psychopaths and narcissists — who own 90+% of the media, social media, and information that the majority consume. Get out of your algorithm bubble and check your expectations against the actual data, else you'll be operating on false information, and reality will shatter your delusions eventually... check yourself before you wreck yourself!

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

100%. Trump is going to do everything in his power to make life in NYC hell, and with help from the right wing media he'll pin it on Mamdani. As you can see from today's New York Post cover, they're already laying the foundation.

See also this piece in The Atlantic, or go read the comments on any mainstream news coverage of this election.