this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
130 points (97.8% liked)

politics

26268 readers
3796 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 78 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Filibuster ends. Trump adds 7 new justices to the Supreme Court. The next democratic president adds 14 justices to offset Republican picks. The next Republican president adds 28 new justices and on and on...

Within 40 years the entire population of the United States is on the Supreme Court.

[–] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 73 points 16 hours ago

Maybe then at least we will get some say in how this country is ran. 🙃

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So then we'll become a true democracy? Right now, land is getting more equal representation than people are getting.

Soon: "In a 200M to 130M decision, the SCOTUS has ruled that abortions, sex work, and weed are legal, student loans are predatory and hereby forgiven and future interest rates capped, and income over $1M in a year is taxed at 100% while corporate tax rates have been raised to 70%. The increased revenue will fund healthcare, social safety net programs, and boost infrastructure programs. In other news, the execution of the traitor in chief will be at the Capitol at noon and be televised live to deter future attempts at fascist takeover. Thankfully he was stupid enough to accidentally give power to the people."

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 minutes ago

You need to run for public office on this platform! Lol

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It will take 26 cycles to meet the current population of the United States. That is 104 to 208 years from now. Supposedly our population has peaked and is slowly declining.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think we got 5-10 more years of growth, then the decline comes. Can't come soon enough honestly. Planet needs a break and most humans around the planet are moving to right wing extremism.

I don't believe in god, but if that mf does exist. I hope he comes soon and takes all these religious Christian nationalist with him. That would solve a bunch of problems on the planet.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Look, I do believe in God:

  • The rapture is a poorly worked theory born from a weird end times focus which I believe is meant to assist in parting the flock from their cash
  • There is even debate on when it happens.
  • Should if happen, it won't be the people with Jesus on the outside and hate on the inside.
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Sounds a bit like some smaller US states. Which makes sense when you consider that Switzerland isn’t much bigger Massachusetts or New Jersey geographic and population wise.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm not sure but that sounds like a movie I've seen before.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 39 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“The Democrats are far more likely to win the Midterms, and the next Presidential Election, if we don’t do the Termination of the Filibuster (The Nuclear Option!),” Trump wrote.

trump doesn't understand it's called "the nuclear option" because it blows up the sham system the oligarchs put in place.

As long as there's a threat of a filibuster, both sides have an excuse not to do anything productive.

Right now all it it takes is someone saying "I heard someone might filibuster" and that prevents a vote. That's why it feels like nothing has been done for over a decade.

Without a filibuster, votes are going to have to happen. Politicians stop being able to claim they would vote for something, and actually have to cast a vote.

trump just assumed "the nuclear option" has to mean it's the biggest possible move, and no one is going to be able to convince him to drop it because of that nickname.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago

No. Stop. Don't.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago

Never interrupt an enemy when they are making a COLLOSAL mistake...

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

Well, yeah. Without the filibuster, Republicans would be able to completely rewrite election laws, giving them total control over the outcomes.

The only way they can win, is to cheat.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Its a ruse to make mercans believe their vote matters anymore.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The "positive anymore" is a blight the Midwest has wrought on the English language.

[–] VicVinegar@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Midwesterners are a blight.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 38 minutes ago

If that's how you feel then I won't be sharing any casserole with you, thank you very much!

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago