this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2379 readers
272 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, it seems to be official now. Starting April 14, 2025 Google will update its Unfair advantage policy to say it is allowed to show the same ad, from the same company, going to the same page, as long as the ad is in a different ad location. Google was just experimenting with double serving ads earlier and now it is officially going to be allowed.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Right, because we all know how effective it is to be hit with the same ad fifteen times an hour.

[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My response to google or any of their adjacents is "wait people are seeing ads?"

Even though i know that yes, the majority do just let the ads blare into their brain. I just don't engage with them to a point that it surprises me people still have energy to complain about em.

Recently told one of my friends about ublock and he was flabbergasted. He'd been just raw dogging the internet since its creation. Was more surprised he never stopped to think "maybe it doesn't have to be like this."

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yea, that's a point, but I suspect that most people don't know how to block them.

And at work, I don't have ad block of any kind. Rarely matters, but sometimes.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Even when they know it's sad how little effort people are willing to put forth

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

People have more energy to complain than to fix.

I managed to install LibreWolf + uBlock on my work computer. I haven't fucked around with custom filters on that setup but power user mode is on and most 3rd party stuff is blocked. And JS is disabled by default.

It's actually quite refreshing: pages load superfast and because most of my internet searching is technical documentation/blogs/stack overflow, not having JS running doesn't bother me 90% of the time.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

Well, my ad blocker will just block twice as many ads then.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

This is actually a step in the right direction for once

Way to late but its a start