What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Honestly, this video is disingenuous.
No one is arguing that it can't be SA just because they're athletes, and that had nothing to do with the judge's ruling.
The judge went through the evidence and it seemed more likely that she consented then not.
This is a better article and was extremely easy to find: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0qlwnyy70o
I'm I wrong or is it odd she did a consent video after the fact surrounded by a bunch of guys. Like they doesn't seem like pressure to anyone else.
Maybe but like that there is no way to do anything like this anymore.
This may come as a shock to some people but many women enjoy sex, many women enjoy gangbangs, and a women making a consent nvidronfor a gangbang is something I've never heard of before and FFS, shouldn't be necessary.
But she did anyway and the result on the Internet is: weeeeellll, I think she was forced anyways!
So now what? Do we need a notarized confession of consent before we can have sex?
I get the problem, but I also get that we remove any natural normal human interactions with this.
A valid point raised in the video as well. These 19 something year old players allege that the complainant was begging for sex, and everyone felt awkward. No one films to document this remarkable scene that sounds like a porn video.
But, they definitely had time to record a consent video.
It took me too long to figure out she was saying 'SA-ing' and not 'essay-ing.' I thought it was new Gen Z slang.
God, I fucking hate the self censoring so much. There is just something so corpo-cucked about it.
Unfortunately it's not as simple as self sponsorship. There's a long list of words that YouTube auto detects, and then those videos will get automatically demonized. Technically you can say pretty much whatever you want, but you cut yourself off from making any ad revenue and the YouTube algorithm will suppress your views as a result. I guess it's more like a coerced corpo-cucking.
It is new slang, and it wouldn't be an issue if they simply used a video sharing platform that doesn't subscribe to the Chinese communist government's moral guidelines.
Oh yeah. Yep. That makes sense. Personally, I'm a fan of "unalive," but only because it's funny.
nothing really funny about that, but you do you
Are you seriously too young to remember the Adpocalypse?
yeah SA is kinda new and a way to keep videos flagged for inappropriate content. Honestly i know its annoying but they have to cover themselves so the video doesn't get flagged.
How about you stop using fucking platforms that do this shit?
Fuck the platforms and fuck all the shit-eating cocksmiths that perpetuate this asinine bullshit.
I'm regrettably not surprised, just very disappointed.
when i heard the news come out from the acquittal, i was not happy with the outcome. I feel like it required further investigation and judicial action.
The very reason that SA cases are so hard to prove is that the investigations are often just character and hearsay based.
Personally I'd say filming a consent video after the act, surrounded by the men, is evidence against consent, not for it.
yeah i agree 100%