this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
514 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26226 readers
6593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Ordinary people get one vote. Billionaires get the opportunity to spend as much as they want to elect the candidates they want,” [Senator Bernie] Sanders said, decrying the influence of super PACs that can accept unlimited political donations. “That is the context in which this election is taking place.”

[Alexandria] Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), meanwhile, cast the race as one that “mirrors what we are up against nationally, both an authoritarian criminal presidency, fueled by corruption and bigotry and an ascendant right-wing extremist movement,” as well as the “insufficient, eroded, bygone political establishment, this time in the form of Andrew Cuomo.”

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they can afford to buy Trump gifts, they can afford to pay taxes.

[–] LikeableLime@piefed.social 36 points 3 days ago

Zohran said it best in the debate, they're spending more money to smear him than they would be paying in extra taxes if he won.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Always nice when you can find an excuse to wear the same dress twice

collapsed inline media

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I highly recommend watching AOC’s speech, she was amazing, truly inspirational.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only thing I don't like about AOC is her voice, it's like nails on a chalkboard to me. It's worse when she's speaking to a crowd or just really motivated or angry, calm interview tone I can handle, but speeches... nope. I'd vote for her, but I'd just read her statements rather than listen to them.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 4 points 2 days ago

Oh no, I'd listen to her over him any day. Plus I'd actually vote for her, not something I've ever said or will say about him.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago

Technically, voting has already started.

Go. Cuomo!

Just...go.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That must have been the most out of place Kathy Hochul has been since that one time she accidentally went to Jamaica, Queens instead of to lunch with a billionaire owner donor at a luxury resort in Jamaica, the country.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I was like Mahndani, yeah! AOC, yeah!, Bernie, fuck yeah! Hochul what the fuck is she lost.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

tax the rich.... lets see how this plays out.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

If I paid the highest tax rate on all my income but we had the type of universal healthcare where I don't have to worry about any bills I just go in and get done what needs to be done and hey maybe gives me cabfare home if I need it. I would be so happy although it would nice to have other social safety nets.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Eat* damn autocorrect