this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
83 points (96.6% liked)

politics

26293 readers
1854 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

naming Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio as potential running mates. The president refused to rule out running for a third term himself during the exchange.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Constitution rules out a third term.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Constitution prohibits a treasonous person from getting the highest position in the country, that didn't prevent him from doing it.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

Lol Marco Rubio still thinks he's going to ass-kiss his way into the big chair.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only way Trump isn't going to be running again is if he gets some insanely bad dirt on the both of them.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Ghouls that they are, I can see the ~~Republicans~~ Confederates try to run his corpse "Weekend at Bernie's" style.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There are some legal scenarios ~~under which this could technically happen~~, but it would be monumental and shocking if the Trump regime could actually manage to wield the coordination and leverage the trust needed to pull it off:

Peabody, email to FactCheck.org, Nov. 15: There are actually five fairly clear scenarios through which a twice-elected president could again become or act as president:

Such a person could[:]

(1) serve as Vice President and then become President in the case of removal, death or resignation of the President

(2) serve as Vice President and then act as President during a period in which the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the Office, as authorized by (a) a written declaration from the President him or herself, or (b) through the VP and a “majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments” or some other authorized body indicating that the President is disabled/unable to discharge the duties of the office (25th Amendment)

(3) become Vice President-elect and then President if “at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President-elect shall have died” (20th Amendment)

(4) become Vice President-elect and then act as President if “a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of [the] term, or if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify” (20th Amendment)

(5) act as President under circumstances provided for by the Succession Act of 1947 which kicks in [when] both the President and the VP are unable to discharge their duties

Despite Vance having the electability of a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, it would be pretty delicious to see him become President with Trump as his VP, only for Vance to refuse to resign. Watching the administration eat itself to get him out would be the height of irony.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

I don't know why everyone is saying Trump can backdoor into the Presidency by becoming the VP first, as you can't become the VP if you're ineligible for being the President. (Text from the 12th amendment)

edit: originally said 13th, but I intended to say 12th.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I did not know this! Thank you. However, I think you mean the 12th Amendment.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

You are correct, edited my post to reflect this.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IIRC Bannons plans require the pres AND the VP to resign. Whoever is next in line at that point is where Bannon imagines Trump

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Speaker of the House. Which makes mid-terms all the more important.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m surprised it wouldn’t be the American himmler, Stephan Miller and and the corpse of David Duke.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Miller (like most vampires) needs SPF 2000 to go out in daylight so he's better suited to working behind the scenes.

[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Your comment had me hopeful that I had missed news about David Duke's death.

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

From an administration with low favorability ratings, two people with high unfavorability ratings. Foolproof plan. No notes!