this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
107 points (96.5% liked)

politics

26226 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The California governor acknowledged in an interview Sunday on CBS that he would give the question serious thought after the 2026 elections.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Newsom would be absolutely horrible for our country

It's been less than a year since he started his podcast with Charlie Kirk and fawned over hi, then had Steve Bannon a few weeks later and treated him the same.

Newsom isn't on our side, he's just saying what his team of PR people tell him to say. There's a very good chance if he loses the primary he pulls a Cuomo/RFK Jr.

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah...I used to like him but have started really hating him in the last decade. The only reason he looks good right now is because everyone else is just that bad.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

The only reason he looks good right now is because everyone else is just that bad.

Everyone else the billionaire owned media wants you to see.

There's some good things happening all over, lots of people at the state level putting in work and gaining ground back.

But if CNN talked about them, Newsom would look like an angry bully like when he joined up with Charlie Kirk to shit on anyone who's lgbt

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

God i hope there's more people to vote for than this guy

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry! I heard Kamala might run too!

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If I hadn't already seen articles on this, I'd take it as a joke.

This timeline is difficult to believe sometimes.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Jeez I thought they were joking. The Dem party can't be that dense. There's no way.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would love for a fairytale ending where AOC takes it in a landslide but I think anyone pretending a dark skinned minority woman can win in this climate might just be brain dead.

I me a if magically she wins the primaries by a landslide great, but she won't, and worse yet, unlike Mamdani who is fighting uphill both ways, she's not nearly as sharp on her feet and she can't promise as much as he has because without a senate majority you just can't make that much change in the USA.

More than that, she would have to work with the other democrats who obviously are center right, so pushing through progressive policies would be extremely difficult.

You also have to remmebr that the billionaires that control ad spend wouldn't be spending very much on her, and let me put it this way, Lemmy is a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the reach the platforms they own have.

These are the realities I feel many hyper online leftists don't want to acknowledge.

Given the realities, Newsom is the most solid choice to put out the immediate fire that I've seen floated so far.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anyone that cares about her skin tone is already voting for R anyways.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I'd like to think that, but the fact he got similar votes this past election to the previous one and she got less than Biden did (Hillary got less than Biden did too while they both ran essentially the same campaigns) tells a different story.

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Gimme a fucking break, he's already been running for years. Of course he's running. Our duty is to smack that shit down ASAP.

Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any good contenders.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Illinois governor, Pritzker is a fantastic alternative.

Of course the best choice for a nationality known candidate would be AOC, but she also had the GOP attack dogs on her for close to a decade.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Pritzker should just stay governing Illinois.

He's doing a decent job.
He should stay where he is needed.

[–] f1error@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I hope he doesn't. He'd be more of the same, pre-tRump. We don't need more of the same; we need very successful new. And very left, non-maggot new.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 4 days ago

Sit down. We're tired of capitalists

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Can you guys who don't like the idea elaborate?

I've seen Newsome as generally a good leader. He did fuch up a few times with treating the homeless. However, here is why I would vote for the guy:

1)Better than a rotten sack of potatoes. 2)Does talk and move like a real person. 3)Has generally improved California... And here's the thing Republicans might like, there are still poor people in California and they're mostly brown! Don't you guys want that? 4)He helped the California economy grow during a tough time and did not bankrupt a casino in Las Vegas!

That said I would vote AOC at the drop of a hat because she's a woman and I want a first woman president to happen. Additionally, she's smart and has been on the side of the people. As an example she has not shot any of her dogs. Bernie, who I would also love as president, even now, supports her. AOC is a name all are familiar with. But perhaps we need to compromise so we can get the lunatics out...how about another sane white guy? I know a couple of white people in my community, I'm sure many of us know a white guy or two. Whoever it is, we need to figure it out soon so that we all vote for just that one gu....oh right, we don't have a say in the presidential election. I forgot that its actually a bunch of randoes who vote for us...we're totally unsmart regarding this way of electing.

Honey! You want pizza or pad Thai? Tell these 50 rando people what you want and they will certainly get you what you want after they vote for it. Don't worry, they're on your side! In the history of us being married they've chosen almost always exactly as most of us would have chosen our beans! So they're perfect! Here are your beans.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Key issues:

  • Newsom is in bed with fossil fuel industry lobbyists. He'll take environmental action only so long as it does not fundamentally put their business at risk, and we need to actually shut it down
  • hes perfectly happy to throw trans people under the bus (as on his podcast with the late Kirk)

These mean I will prefer another candidate in the primaries

[–] butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm gonna need a higher bar than not potatoes. I don't know how many times I can be expected to vote for "barely not a republican" consecutively but we've definitely passed that point. Clearly voting for the candidate that's a Democrat and slightly better than potatoes hadn't worked... like at all. I'm so tired of "Vote Blue No Matter Who (unless the blue candidate is to the left of Schumer and co. then they're basically Hamas)"

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

I have the opposite problem. But I won't state it. I don't want to give ideas to the you know who people.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Men and their dick insecurities are a big problem in politics. We need more women.

Men had their chance. Look at what they have done.

We need women who prioritize taking care of others over their own ego. Can't say I know of very many male politicians who are like that. But a lot of women are.

AOC. She's what we need. She's not bought. She's not corrupt. She's never raped anyone.

Let's vote for the best option. She's it.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Japan just elected their first woman president and member of a rock band...the drummer of all choices. I don't understand how but she's supposedly a conservative. But regardless, she is a woman. I hope she does good by her people and gives us an example to follow. I used to think AOC was a self centered person because she used to be a cheerleader in highschool. But boy was I wrong. That gir is a firecracker as they say. If she's on the ballot, I'm voting AOC.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I saw online she is a nationalist and right winger. So. We will see I guess. Hopefully she gets their paedophile problem addressed.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't understand how but she's supposedly a conservative.

Far right Trump lover who wants a return to traditional values. You know which tradition she's talking about, and it's not a Japanese tradition.

Also, prime minister not president, and not elected.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh that's right! Not elected. OK that must really suck. So who elects the PM in jaypan if its not the people? A Parliament? Do the people have a choice somewhere at the bottom of the scheme at all? You know like us and our wonderful electoral college that gave us the guy who keeps on giving!... Err...taking, our rights away.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The biggest party in the parliament, or a coalition, pick the prime minister. I'm pretty sure this one was from a coalition, and she was the leader of her party, and her party was the bigger of the coalition. Members of parliament do get elected into it by the people, who vote for a person and/or for a list. They didn't pick her to be leader of the party, but they voted for the people in the party that she recently became leader of.

That said I would vote AOC at the drop of a hat because she's a woman and I want a first woman president to happen.

Stop. Just fucking stop. We should absolutely have had women be President by now and that is a valid desire. But it is not a good basis on it's own to decide your vote. Be more discerning.

Additionally, she's smart and has been on the side of the people.

These are good bases for deciding your vote. Policy, ethics, character, competence, intelligence, etc. These are reasons to vote for AOC. She is a good choice in all those regards. These should be your first reasons, not her vagina.

As an example she has not shot any of her dogs.

Again, stop. AOC is a good choice on her own merit, not just in juxtaposition to the craziest crazies of the right. If you set the bar at being "Not Trump" or "Not Kristi Noem" or not whoever, that's where people get the idea that your candidate has nothing else to offer.

Assuming we get another election, if it ends up coming down to Newsom v Trump, or Vance, or whatever GOP goon builds enough of a following after Trump kicks it, he'll almost certainly have my vote because the alternative is insanity. But Newsom is a classic neo-liberal pro-capitalist, anti-homeless opportunist. He only looks good next to Trump. On his own, he's a greasy sleezeball classic politician. If we want real change, we need a true progressive.

Please. Please don't. We don't need any help from you, Neo-liberals. Give the Progressives some room.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'm seeing a lot of propaganda for him

Remember. The democratic party is corrupt.

We not only are fighting fascist maga here. We are fighting the whole system that has allowed fascism to rise.

80% of the democratic party is corrupt and they need voted out. I don't care how good looking they are. I don't care how entertaining they are. I don't care if they troll Trump or not.

Idgaf about posturing.

What I care about is if they are bought.
And newsome is bought.

Israel and big corp owns him. He does not work for the people. He works to enrich his own wealth.

The only people who can fix this country are people like AOC and Bernie. And a few other Dems who don't take corporate pac money.

Vote wisely.

Otherwise things will continue to get worse. We need big changes. Not someone willing to placate the people just barely enough so they stop demanding change.

Otherwise in 10 years we will be in even worse off than now.

Keep your eyes on the goal. Don't be swayed by clever messages. Or good looking men pretending to be super heros.

Look at the facts. Look at who pays him.

He does not work for the people.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

What a cowardly sack of shit he is...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

No. No no no. No.

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And then you get the dems doing the bidding of the nazis instead. Overton window continues to shift. Fuck him. He’d rather have a dead child than a trans child

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 days ago

He is definitely willing to toss trans people under the bus. Ill be actively working for another candidate in the primary as a result

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why are people still acting like there will be an election?