The guys name is too perfect.
Altman. Alternative man.
Just not a good alternative.
After his extreamly creepy interview with Tucker Carlsson about that whistleblower who died, I know he is not right in the head.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
The guys name is too perfect.
Altman. Alternative man.
Just not a good alternative.
After his extreamly creepy interview with Tucker Carlsson about that whistleblower who died, I know he is not right in the head.
I have a feeling people are gonna remember that when his job gets wiped out.
I've been thinking a lot about this since chatgpt dropped and I agree with Sam here despite the article trying to rage bait people. We simply shouldn't protect the job market from the point of view of identity or status. We should keep an open mind of jobs and work culture could look like in the future.
Unfortunately this issue is impossible to discuss without conflating it with general economics and wealth imbalance so we'll never have an adult discussion here. We can actually have both - review/kill/create new jobs and work cultures and address wealth imbalance but not in some single silver bullet solution.
Let's see how that fairs out with say, for example, a general strike?
Is this where they get rid of the telephone sanitizers and middle managers?
if you can't build a complete functional AI, you shouldn't be releasing it to the public to start with.
Pushing AI without looking the negatives, just to make a "better feature", does not work like this.
Techdirt's infamous buggy whip post
If I was an information worker I'd be trying to be in the top 20% of my field. If it hits 75% of the industry, I have a little cushion.
I think your strategy makes sense for all workers. Being aware of your role in the final solution is more important than the steps needed to get there, and tools merely change the process, often improving it in some way.
A guy with a hammer cant automatically build a house without skills, but it sure helps those who have them. A guy with a nail gun can build a house faster and perhaps with less skill, and few argue that it's not a worthy improvement.
Some types of photographers may no longer need to operate a camera, but instead transition into someone who can knowledgeably ask for the results from an AI that properly captures the mood and tone required for the end result.
We're changing how it's done, but not necessarily what is done.
It’s funny, years ago, a single developer “killing it” on Steam was almost unheard of. It happened, but it was few and far between.
Now, with the advent of powerful engines like Unreal 5 and the latest iterations of Unity, practically anyone outside the Arctic Circle can pick one up and make a game.
Is tech like that taking jobs away from the game industry? Yes. Very much so. But since those programs aren’t technically “AI,” they get a pass. Never mind that they use LLMs to streamline the process, they’re fine because they make games we enjoy playing.
But that’s missing the point. For every job the deployment of some “schedule 1” or “megabonk” tech replaced, it enabled ten more people to play and benefit from the final product. Those games absolutely used AI in development, work that once would’ve gone to human hands.
Technology always reduces jobs in some markets and creates new ones in others.
It’s the natural way of things.
If Sam got wiped out he would even be a real man anyway
"Real job" is often an anti-intellectualist code word for hard manual labor.
There's actually a lot of bullshit jobs out there. Things that could be automated(without AI) or when companies feel the need to do a hiring binge to appear like they're growing. A lot of useless busywork. C-suits especially could be replaced or eliminated first though.