this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26226 readers
6593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They have a ‘Hate America’ rally that’s scheduled for October 18 on the National Mall,” the House speaker, Mike Johnson, said on Fox News on Friday. “It’s all the pro-Hamas wing and, you know, the antifa people. They’re all coming out.”

On 18 October, tens of millions of people in the streets, peacefully exercising the democratic rights that the Trump regime is laboring to eliminate, will give the lie to Maga’s hallucinatory network of bomb-throwing traitors. No Kings will show America who the real haters are.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it were violent treason I might go. It’s just gonna be a bunch of people yelling at institutions that don’t give a fuck what they think.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

The march isn't for those institutions. It's for the institutions that want to stand up to Trump but don't know if the people have their back. For instance, the judges that are currently keeping the Texas National Guard off the streets of Chicago.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like how Meidas pointed out that little Mikey couldn't even say the actual name of the rallies, since being against kings is kinda America's brand identity.

This is the party that cannot even say the fucking name of the Democratic Party though, so....shrug. They've been saying it incorrectly for 70+ years because they are fucking children. Again, Murc's Law - they are expected, to a one, even at the top of their party, to behave like brats, but the Democratic Party is expected to be the adults at all times. Just imagine if the Democratic Party started to say "Publican Party" at every opportunity, from the President all the way down to liberal talking heads, and no one were to question them about it?

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/democrat-party-republican-insult.html

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

man, that ‘democrat party’ bullshit is one of the very few digs that actually bugs me. and it’s been on for so long that i think there’s a whole generation that doesn’t know the actual name.

i tried ‘republic party’ for a while, but as you can see, i failed to make fetch happen.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It annoys me, too, and probably because it's been going on for 70+ years (multi-generational at this point) and gets zero push back. From people that sure as hell know better and are in a position to ask why Republicans cannot use the right name. Just question it. Embarrass them. Keep asking why adult leaders in their party are being so childish - do they even know the right name?

It's one thing if it's people online goofing or people on the street, whatever. I do it quite frequently and come up with nicknames for the opposition. But I'm not a politician and I'm not a talking head. I have no platform and no power and no prominence.

How an entire party can get away with it and have zero commentary on it in any meaningful way is really wild.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You CAN'T "prove wrong" ideology/prejudice/"religion",

aka any AXIOM-BASED rejecting-of-falsification, belief.

It isn't possible because axioms aren't subject-to-objectivity.

They will either force violence, enforce violence, XOR/AND have false-flag actors in-place to "prove" their "fact".

It is a trap.

Civil-rights are going to get at-least-partially rug-pulled as a result of Saturday's protests.

IF Trump can permanently-remove any threat of accountability, & permanently-deactivate the petition to get the Epstien-files released, HE IS GOING TO.

Social-assertion isn't fundamental-enough, or powerful-enough to do what the left is assuming it must do!

( the left obeys social-pressure: that's left-culture!

Which means that the left can't understand when others don't.

That is why Naomi Klien had to publish "Saying No Isn't Enough" .. or whatever her book was called .. because the left wasn't GETTING it.

Courts, sousveillance, private-investigating-and-prosecuting-right-crime, THAT could apply the kind of pressure required, but social-pressure's the wrong too to produce the required-results.

It's a 1-way tool: it only works against the consensus-motivated left, not against the authority-and-conforming-enforcing right. )

sigh

Expect the left to find the "ground" they're "standing on" to have been gutted, by next week.

& the escalations will only continue progressing: this isn't the BIG tipping-point, this is just one of the buildup ones.

( this was all built on the shit-quality "education" that the US's the-rich-get-good-education-the-poor-don't paradigm enforced, through the last .. century+.

It isn't possible to save a country's life if its population is "educated" into the lower-forebrain's imprint->reaction paradigm, instead of the upper-forebrain's objectivity + considered-reasoning paradigm:

the only question left is which ideology will gain supremacism,

not can-ideology-the-system-be-prevented-from-ruling-us. )

_ /\ _