this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6075 readers
1813 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hallettj@leminal.space 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

My favorite take on this question comes from Existential Comics

Wow, I haven't seen that comic in years; the first time I saw it I was in a pretty bad mental space and I think this perspective helped more than I realized at the time. Thanks for the memory ❤️

i love that one. sometimes it's a giggle, sometimes it's a gutpunch, always worth reading.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's a solid one

Damn, that's really good.

[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

My only counterpoint to the "suicide booth" argument is that people have some semblance of consciousness during transport.

It was a TNG episode where we learn that Barkley is able to see an energy monster during transport. If he was totally ripped apart and "dead" then I'd expect there to be a blank part of his memory during the moments the body is turned to energy.

[–] hallettj@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem with appealing to episode details is that the transporter is presented very differently in different episodes depending on the needs of the story. That's fine for storytelling, but it means we can't pin down a fixed set of rules for how transporters work. To ponder philosophical questions we have to invent rules by picking and choosing presentations of the transporter that seem most interesting, and filling in gaps with our imaginations.

Yes, there's the episode where Barclay is conscious during transport. But there are contradictory presentations where Scotty puts himself in stasis in the ship that crashed on the Dyson's sphere, and M'Benga putting his daughter in stasis. In those cases neither has memories of time during transport.

There is the episode where Picard uses the transporter to convert himself into an energy being to try to live in a space cloud. The story is the transporter converts matter to energy, and energy in Star Trek is another possible state of living existence. Thus continuity. But there is a contradictory episode of DS9 where crew members' physical and neural patterns have to be stored in computer memory, not "pure energy", and we see holosuite character versions of them.

So there's either no suicide booth problem, or there is. You get to pick depending on which scenario you feel like talking about.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since both have been depicted, both must be true. There is no need to pick or choose:

  • You are conscious during transport. "You" are actually transported from A to B. This is true because the series shows it to be true. You can overthink it as much as you want, but transporter technology is normal and well understood in Star Trek, and if it would kill you in any way it would not be considered "the safest mode of transport" in-universe. We are looking at transporter technology the same way a neanderthal would look at an aircraft.
  • The transporter has an element of technology called a "Heisenberg compensator". It's easy to extrapolate that storing a person's energy pattern into the transport computer is a function of this. The person is still alive, consciously, as energy. But the computer needs a stored reference (or more likely; scanning the in transit energy pattern, store it as data, and then use that data for reassembly) to turn them back into solid matter.
  • The above is how humans can be stuck as energy eels. Or how Picard can have a gay merry vacation in a cloud of gas.
  • We can infer that directly transporting from point A to point B is very different from sticking yourself into a pattern buffer, because the series treats it as such. That's not an inconsistency. Scotty is also the first one to have tried this, as Geordi reacted like nobody has ever tried this before, so there are a lot of unknowns involved (let's leave NuTrek entirely out of this discussion, as it fucks continuity harder than Enterprise ever did).
  • Scanning your brain pattern and using it in a hologram is nothing new. This is done a lot in Star Trek, and it doesn't even involve transporter technology in most instances. The holodeck can create completely accurate personalities based on what is available of those that are still alive, and it's even how the first EMH was created.

how Picard can have a gay merry vacation

collapsed inline media

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Assuming it’s a particle transfer instead of data transmission, what the transporter does is disassemble things at an atomic scale. But it doesn’t disperse you, that’s what the confinement beam is for.

(This is grizzly, but hear me out.) there’s a 2cm hole. You obviously can’t fit through. But if you were chopped into 1cm cubes you would. What if that chopping didn’t upset you or cause pain, what if those pieces were held inside a stasis field to prevent them from falling apart or leaking? What if they were put back together perfectly in a matter of seconds. Would your body react like it was chopped into pieces? Would it even understand that that’s what happened? If you chop someone’s head off clean enough and fast enough it takes the brain several seconds to realize it’s not connected to the body anymore.

Transporters take this to the nth degree. It cuts you up into pieces so small that you can pass through solid matter as long as you stay within that (stupid strong) confinement beam. Apparently, if you are carefully disassembled without trauma and those pieces are kept in the general vicinity of each other, you don’t die AND you remain aware. And before your body can declare that something is wrong and react, you’re back in one piece.

Maybe your (carefully spaced apart) brain is confused and thinks you’re dreaming so it doesn’t get upset.

Even when you stay within the conservative rules of how a transporter behaves they are still tremendous hacks on a fundamental level.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 9 points 1 week ago

Then there is Scotty who was caught up in a pattern buffer for almost a century crashed on a Dyson sphere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Yes but we also meant that Barkley has multiple mental illnesses, and is an unreliable narrator.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

If that were the case, Scotty being stuck in the transporter buffer for 100 years would be a nightmare on his subconscious.there has to be a demarcation point where the consciousness can't function without the brain structures in place. That'd be the death point.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Star Trek science has always been for non scientists. if you could move a pattern and save a pattern, then everyone would backup to the last healthy copy of themselves.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

there is ethics about body modification and especially about enhancing your self artificially, it's seen as a dead end because people who are artificially "perfected" end up being stagnant and pointless. experiencing aging and illness is a part of ethical behavior, or is ultimately preferable to the alternative.

[–] original_reader@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'd also lose all my memories since the backup. With those memories goes the way I make decisions. Not the most desirable way of maintaining youth and health. Kirk made that point in ST:V:

"Damn it, Bones, you're a doctor. You know that pain and guilt can't be taken away with a wave of a magic wand. They're the things we carry with us, the things that make us who we are. If we lose them, we lose ourselves.

I don't want my pain taken away!

I need my pain!"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TypFaffke@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Transporters ar le weird. The way Dr. M'Benga keeps people in the transport buffer until there is a cure for their disease (Rukiya) or until medical facilities are no longer overrun (Battle of J'Gal) is presented as a hack. How is it not standard procedure?

Also he has to materialize them from time to time because their pattern degrades. So is it not a digital image of sorts? How can it degrade?

[–] LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would happen to the people if the buffer were to lose power or malfunction in any way? Even a small risk of anything adverse plus the degradation while being stored would make this not acceptable from medical viewpoint.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have to wonder why the pattern must be lost in the process of materialization. I'm not saying they should keep them forever, but if they can just not delete the patterns when sending people on a dangerous away mission, they'd leave open the option of restoring them to a back up state if they get killed (or worse).

Of course, while that would raise a lot of questions to be explored in a single episode, it would lower stakes and fundamentally changes the stories they can tell, so I'm not surprised they writers don't do it.

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The pattern is clearly meant to be more than just data too, because they have used previous transporter logs when they need a healthy snapshot to compare to a crewmate who is ill. It seems to be some kind of superstitious energy reserve that is that person, and no you can't just siphon some juice out of the reactor and use previous scan data for reasons that are generally presented as technical ones, but could really only logically be ethical ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No DNA fixes either, I guess to not break the universe, but still wtf.

[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There are loads of examples where they edit the image before rematerializing. Like removing an illness or fixing age or splitting Tuvix.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thomas Riker is the result of someone basically sending down a second transporter beam, overlapped over the first one.. Which resulted in Riker basically being put into two matter buffers.. which resulted in essentially a clone when one of the transporters reflected off the atmospheric conditions back to the ground.

proper use of a transporter doesnt cause issues.. that was not a proper use of a transporter iirc.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Let's say you're given two ways to travel faster than light:

Star Trek Teleporter/Matter Reassembler

And

Shuttle through the Wormhole to the Gamma Quadrant

Which would you prefer and why?

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Send a postcard. I'll keep my ass on the couch at home.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Y'all thought Picard'a brother was the bad guy.

Man just wanted to live and drink wine. C'est la vida loca

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the wormhole seems safer, since its the prophets artificial wormhole and its stable, made more stable later in the series, not so for other wormholes, they seem to have the same dangers as random transporter malfunctions . The transporter seems fickle , numerous incidents where it had cloned, killed, merged 2 people into one, depending on the plot of the episode, or it cant transport fast enough when someone is shooting a disruptor weapon at you, ends up killing the person, or the transporter picks up some wierd pathogen/lifeforms. plus the wormhole doesnt require energy to use, so no problems activating it.

honorable mentions, is other than the ICONIAN gateways which is probably the best ftl type of instananeous rift travel, subspace catapults, or even the caretakers intergalatic ftl dimensional rift generator/teleporter, other forms of transporters/rift/interdimensional teleporters are pretty complicated and somewhat dangerous.

If the transporter is going to kill me and recreate me at the destination, then I'm going wormhole.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Teleporter lets you chose locations

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You are everywhere dude

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I remember Noam Chomsky mentioning this when talking to his kids or grandkids when talking about psychic continuity. I believe the question was surrounding what would happen if you weren’t “teleported”, but instead you remained on the ship as well as the remote location.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For book explorations on this theme see :

The Punch Escrow

and

The Bobiverse

Though the latter doesn't focus on it as much as the former.

[–] Angelevo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mhm. US centric 3.6. I will skip the first. Have listened to and enjoyed Bobiverse. :)

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

It's less US centric than it is catered to US sensibilities of narrative, but it's a valid criticism.

The reason i mentioned it is because it deals with the exact situation outlined in the original post.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Your body replaces most of its cells over the course of about a decade, give or take a few years (except for brain cells, which admittedly throws a wrench in my point). What’s not to say it didn’t kill the version of you 10 years ago?

Further more, think of yourself from 1 day ago. Can that exact version of yourself still act on the world, or is that version effectively dead as the result of your mind changing over time? That exact version of you isn’t somehow carried on by soul.

In some sense, the very continuity of consciousness could be viewed as a continual process of death of the old self; all the transporter does is create a brief gap in that continuum.

In a nutshell, we’re always dying in some form as a product of the nature of time itself. Why should we get mad at the transporter?

Maybe the soul is how we transcend these deaths; maybe there’s no such thing as a soul.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Uh huh, when the gleisners show up and offer Introdus, accept.

The idea that we aren't working on anti-aging and life extension has always been bizarre to me, but seeing what humans are like, it's probably for the best we don't try, as upsetting as that is.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be interesting to have a series where they take the best of the best Starfleet personnel, intentionally copy them with a transporter, and stick them on their own ship to do an extra dangerous, super difficult mission.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Intentionally send them on Boarding runs to take over other ships.

But then of course eventually you will have the problem that you need one Picard to rule above all others. Space is apparently only so big - given the constant politics.

load more comments
view more: next ›