this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
917 points (97.5% liked)

memes

17882 readers
2161 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(TikTok screencap)

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Here's a very horny variant of this idea (no idea how it counts as SFW by Youtube standards)

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Corps, core and corpse

Anything containing "ough"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Send me a picture of you wearing mom jeans.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

Political trolls

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

..."aren't". What's "ain't" a contraction of, exactly?

I agree with the sentiment though.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

"Ain't" is okay, but I only use it in quotes, that is, when quoting a character. Formal writing should not include slang, unless quoting.

But this is not formal writing, so "ain't" is acceptable. It's not improper word use like "loose" for "lose", or "you're" when "your" is correct based on context. It's like writing "gonna" instead of "going to". Or "y'all", instead of "all of you", because we don't have a plural pronoun for "you".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›