this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
523 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

9743 readers
4155 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Nor will they let you vote their power away.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Second favorite Lucy Parsons quote after "Let every dirty, lousy tramp arm himself with a revolver or a knife, and lay in wait on the steps of the palaces of the rich and stab or shoot the owners as they come out. Let us kill them without mercy, and let it be a war of extermination." awesome person

Absolutely based, no war but class war

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

one of the purge episode of rick and morty is like that. the alien girl ended up slaughtering with a tech suit all the "aristocrats" because they were trying to end the purge that kept the "poors" distracted.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

thats why they are freaking out over madhami in NYC, Madhami said paying a small amount of taxes by rich shouldnt affect them significantly, but what people said in a reddit thread recently, they are afraid it opens up more legislation against them. think it was specifically ackerman donating 1mil+ to the sex ghoul cumuo

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago

It's "Mamdani"... Not "Madhami"

Just wanting to point that out.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I feel this is true federally for sure, but I feel it’s still possible at the state level, especially in Blue states.

The big corporations may threaten to walk away, but it’s not like they pay much in taxes for many states anyways. Often they take more than they promise to give back to communities.

Plus, if those big corporations leave, then new local companies can fill the void left behind. Companies that are paying those higher tax rates as well.

We could even have corporate tax brackets so small Mom and Pop shops are paying a lower tax rate than the big corporations.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think Parsons was talking about taxes, but a reordering of society where oligarchs don't control government. That's not on the ballot of any State in this Union. And it's never ever going to be.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

It’s not going to be on the ballot itself, but it can be in hearts of those holding office. If we foster a culture of caring for others and elect leaders that act to help those living in their communities, then we can begin to see a difference being made.

Taxes are a big part of moving power back into the hands of the people. Higher taxes on big corporations can help fund programs like Universal Basic Income, Universal Healthcare, more public housing, and help pay for people’s end of life care.

We’ve been shooting for the stars too much, wanting to change everything so we can help everyone at once. When really, states/provinces should focus on implementing those progressive programs for themselves, and only then try to sell other states/provinces on these programs that we can prove work for us.

[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its true in a world sense.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I agree that the problem appears globally.

The best way to tackle the problem though is local and together. If there are enough communities that care to make change happen, then it can start to occur at the province/state level.

While not every other province or state will be on board with trying those measures, the people living in those areas might be convinced to change when they see their neighbors starting to benefit from progressive programs.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they will try to flee toa country with low or no corporate taxes, plus they hide thier money through tax havens like swiss,deustche bank, cayman island, cyrus,,,etc. international money laundering.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Then we gotta slap them wimps with import fees, we can do a trade deal with our allies to make it harder for them. If they can’t spend it they’re pissed, and if we do not allow them to take loans out against their unsold stocks they really are stuck.

I agree with you, they’ll do what they can to keep some money safe and maybe squirrel away to somewhere they won’t be slapped with fees, but they’ll lose access to many of their US assets if they just try to avoid the US market altogether. They want us to believe that the game will always be won by them. Because they’ve always been holding the best cards, they know if they slip up then they may have to play on a fair playing field.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dayum, Lucy! She'd be banned from Reddit if she said that. Then she'd have to come to Lemmy with the rest of us who've gotten banned everywhere for speaking our minds.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was banned from Reddit for posting this quote so, lol, checks out.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

LOL, worth it!

[–] Best_Jeanist@discuss.online 5 points 6 days ago

The relationship of the revolutionary workers’ party to the petty-bourgeois democrats is this: it cooperates with them against the party which they aim to overthrow; it opposes them wherever they wish to secure their own position.

the workers, and above all the League, must work for the creation of an independent organization of the workers’ party, both secret and open, and alongside the official democrats

Even where there is no prospect of achieving their election the workers must put up their own candidates to preserve their independence, to gauge their own strength and to bring their revolutionary position and party standpoint to public attention.

- Karl Marx, address to the Communist League

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Might be my favorite anarchist of all time!