this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
246 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26213 readers
6480 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jon Paul Sheptock, 49, served as the worship minister at the First Montgomery Baptist Church in Texas before these shocking allegations came to light.

The Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Unit eventually caught up with the suspect while he was working at a local women’s prison where he served as a minister.

At a Donald Trump rally in January 2022, Sheptock was recruited to sing the national anthem before later posing with the president and his son for pictures.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

He will be pardoned like all of trumps other child trafficking friends

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's truly remarkable how about once a week we see a headline like this regarding a conservative. For left leaning people it's more like once every 3-6 months.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you considered that the media you are (or allow yourself to be) exposed to, plays a part in that?

As an example, this took literal seconds to find, and it's an article from this month:

A North Carolina state House member has been charged with sex-related crimes involving a teenager earlier this year, court records show.

Six-term Democratic state Rep. Cecil Brockman, 41, of High Point, was arrested Wednesday on two counts each of statutory sexual offense with a child and taking indecent liberties with a child, according to a magistrate's order detailing his arrest.

I bet you've never heard of this person, or ever saw this article, right?

Before I explicitly looked, I hadn't either. But it's not that it was hidden, really, just that it's not the data the algorithms put in front of my eyes, without me having to go seek it. Don't underestimate the impact these algorithms have on what you're made aware of, and how that controlled exposure can shape, or warp, your sense of reality.

I'll never forget that graph that showed the comparison of how much violent crime had decreased over the years in the US, juxtaposed with public perception of violent crime rates literally rising in inverse proportion over the same period of time, thanks to mainstream media sensationalism. Ever since that day, I've tried to keep myself from making assumptions about how common something is, based on how often it's reported on, especially when it comes to controversial/shocking subjects like these, as those are the ones where there is the most temptation for an outlet to sensationalize.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course it is. CP is a mandatory line item for a typical MAGA resume.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is this kind of absurd hyperbole really productive?

[–] the_radness@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not unless they also mention racism, transphobia and homophobia as the other line items.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So which government department will he be given after the pardon?

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Secretary of foster care

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

WHY ARE THEY ALWAYS DIDDLERS

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Because diddlers will go after whichever demographics allow the most diddling.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Come on, not all singers molest children.

[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Another Republican pedophile? Color me fuckin shocked, eh?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It might be easier at this point to list the Republicans who aren't pedophiles and sexual predators.

Edit:

There.

I think that's all of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BMW_stick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm sure this was Biden's fault.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Nope. Goes all the way back to Obama’s fist-bumping mustard-colored suit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xpey@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Big surprise. /s

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would it save time at this point if, rather than reporting on every Republican paedophile, we just reported every time it was revealed that a Republican wasn’t a paedophile?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Do you want to make all the journalists unemployed?

[–] acme401@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Pedophiles, Republicans, and Texas

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Say it with me now

Grand. Old. Pedophiles.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

More winning for the GOP!!

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

When will he be pardoned?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Don't worry about him, he's not dangerous. He's unarmed.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He has no arms...

Given the charges, that leaves me with some additional questions...

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

The questions shouldn't be too hard. There was once, in the vaudeville scene, a girl who brought the crowds flocking to see her. They watched her eat, drink, put on makeup and shoes. They didn't do it because she was lewd, standing nude, nor because of her words and witty banter... they did it because she had no arms and was able to do it all with her feet.

I could see a setup to type and use a mouse with feet, if not one of those head devices with a laser pointer.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Yea, that checks out.

[–] miguel@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, they'll stop charging people with this soon and then it'll just allllll go away.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago

The writers need to get some new material. They’re starting to repeat themselves.

[–] canajac@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course, he's a hypocritical religious person who hides behind the bible BS he learned from mommy and daddy.

[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Not hypocrisy, the bible supports pedophilia. It's disgusting backwards ass bullshit and half remembered ghost stories written by inbred winos.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like the fact that he was a church minister is much more relevant information for the headline. Who gives a shit that he sang a song at a Trump rally once, seriously? Clickbait slop.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

It establishes notability. There's a lot more ministers than Trump performers.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›