this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
355 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26226 readers
2578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Justice Department placed two D.C.-based federal prosecutors on leave after they filed court papers calling the Jan. 6 Capitol siege a "riot" perpetrated by a "mob," three sources familiar with the matter told CBS News on Wednesday.

The papers were submitted Tuesday in the case of Taylor Taranto, who was pardoned by Trump on Capitol riot charges earlier this year but was later convicted of livestreaming a bomb threat. He was arrested in 2023 while livestreaming himself driving around former President Barack Obama's D.C. neighborhood while armed, according to prosecutors.

The filing — which asked a judge to sentence Taranto to 27 months in prison at a hearing Thursday — mentioned Taranto's Jan. 6 charges and briefly described the events of that day, writing that "thousands of people comprising a mob of rioters attacked the U.S. Capitol."

That unsparing description of the Capitol riot was notable, as Mr. Trump has called Jan. 6 a "day of love" and referred to the rioters as "hostages."

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago

For the record:

According to Trump Justice, this is NOT a mob of rioters:

collapsed inline media

This is:

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Crazy how the president has means to control the DOJ now...

After four years of Biden insisting he had zero control over the DOJ and couldn't do anything to hold actual traitors accountable.

I'll never know if he legitimately didn't understand what powers he held as a president, or if he was just pretending to be that ignorant and incompetent on purpose to avoid the precedent.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or trump is using the DOJ illegally.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Obviously trump is abusing the DOJ...

But that doesn't mean Biden refused to exert all pressure he legally could have to prevent this...

He couldn't directly fire the Special Counsel he appointed, but he could have told the AG to do it due to the delays. Which would have been valid and legal.

If the AG refused, Biden could have replaced the AG and told the new one the same thing.

Even if Biden kept appointing people who didn't do what he publicly said he wanted, he could keep replacing them

But Occam's Razor says Biden and his admin were aware he could do that. And chose not to

And if that was happening, I doubt what he was telling the AG and Special Counsel in private matched what he told us in public.

Like, this is the smallest molehill imaginable, and everyone wants to pretend it was an unsurmountable obstacle.

Is this new information to you?

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you’re looking for someone to defend Biden, it ain’t me. I’m a pro union civilian and he was very anti union. He was just good at making it look like he was pro…. For that reason, I am not a fan of Biden. Do we really know what the true power of a president has?.. I used to think so, but after trump, I’m not so sure. Unless we are planning on climbing the ladder, this argument seems like a moot point.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago

Quote where anyone asked you to defend biden.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biden wanted to make it look like it wasn't political so he assigned a special counsel that he didn't control to do those things. Trump doesn't care about it looking political.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't care for 1984 when I read it. I felt it was too over the top and unbelievable. Turns out it was written by a time traveler.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It was written in a time when that exact sort of thing had just happened recently. And here we are again going through the same shit beacuse history rhymes.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

Those who remember history are doomed to watch everyone else repeat it.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't forgetting they are using it as a play book.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking about the people who are going to have their faces eaten.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah those are the same people.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

^ Ironically, attributed to Orwell, even though he apparently did not write or say this.... :)

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

  • Michael Scott

Or...... possibly Antonio Gramsci

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Always check the veracity of any online quote

  • Albert Einstein
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

I feel like a bit got buried by the headline:

The filing also said Taranto drove to Obama's neighborhood shortly after Mr. Trump posted the former president's purported address on Truth Social and Taranto shared the post.

Trump posted Obama's address online and it wasn't front page news?? Or did I just miss it?

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 13 points 1 day ago

Oh? What collective noun would they have preferred? A murder?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

You need to start looking for sources other than CBS News. It’s being run by someone who should be working for Fox.

CBS is a poor quality source FYI