this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17237 readers
1300 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sadly I've still never seen any real papers on this being an actual theory.

I still want to believe I'm Ent livestock though.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s because it doesn’t really make sense, plants came before animals. Plants do not need us to survive, but we need plants to survive.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Plants came before moths, but there are some desert plants whose life cycle is dependent on a species of moth pollinating them. How things were in the past influences but isn’t the sole arbiter of how things are in the present or future.

Which isn’t to say that it’s strictly true, I think it serves more purpose as a thinking exercise than a scientific theory. But I don’t think it’s impossible that it’s true, either.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

“Some” being a key word there. Plants, as a whole, are not dependent on mammals for their existence.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I don’t think the OP was saying every plant in existence is dependent on humans. But crops are, and we’re dependent on them. Co-domestication, I guess.

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

We don't need chickens to survive either. It doesn't mean we didn't domesticate them.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plants need us animals to turn that oxygen they produce back into carbon dioxide for them.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, fungi and other decomposers do that.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm decomposing with the best of them, my friend.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

You're more of a decomposee than a decomposer.

I think it's the fungi manipulating all of us.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

That top sentence has a bunch of flavor text. Livestock implies they're intentionally being kept as livestock. Plants aren't sentient. That's like saying evolution is intentional.