this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
182 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26213 readers
2379 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's interesting how I'm not hearing this anywhere in the news at all. I've had one user tell me that their instance is actually blocking a post of this article in another instance.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 70 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It may be small government but that's how they're winning.

https://kindbridge.com/online-pornography-age-verification-laws-by-state-map/

States with Active Age Verification Laws (25 Total)

  • Alabama - HB 164
  • Arizona - HB 2112 (effective May 2025)
  • Arkansas - SB 66 (effective July 2023)
  • Florida - HB 3 (effective January 2025)
  • Georgia - SB 351 (effective July 1, 2025)
  • Idaho - H 498 (effective July 2024)
  • Indiana - SB 17/Act 17 (effective August 2024)
  • Kansas - SB 394 (effective July 2024)
  • Kentucky - Law passed
  • Louisiana - HB 142 & HB 77 (first state, effective January 1, 2023)
  • Mississippi - SB 2346
  • Missouri - 15 CSR 60-18 (effective November 30, 2025)
  • Montana - SB 544 (effective January 2024)
  • Nebraska - LB 1092 (effective July 2024)
  • North Carolina - HB 8
  • North Dakota - HB 1561 (effective August 1, 2025)
  • Ohio - HB 96 (effective September 30, 2025)
  • Oklahoma - SB 1959 (effective November 2024)
  • South Carolina - Law effective January 2025
  • South Dakota - Law effective July 1, 2025
  • Tennessee - Law effective January 2025
  • Texas - HB 1181 & HB 18 (upheld by Supreme Court June 2025)
  • Utah - SB 287
  • Virginia - SB 1515
  • Wyoming - Law effective July 1, 2025

States WITHOUT Age Verification Laws (25 Total)

  • Alaska
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Iowa
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Vermont
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s meant to be ironic. Government so small it fits in your pants.

State governments can still be big and intrusive. This idea that small government means states can do whatever they want to abuse their citizens is a right-wing delusion.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago

Lol. I forgot about that saying and missed the irony. Thanks for the laugh, internet friend!

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Porn is an easy target. Gets the religious psychos on board with generalized internet censorship.

They're building the Great Firewall of the US. Brick by brick.

[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The best part is, Blue sky is complying in advance and this is preventing Free speech. https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/29/bluesky-rolls-out-age-verification-for-users-in-ohio/

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It isn't just religious nutjobs.

"Porn addiction" is right up there with "seed oils will give you super diabetic cancer" in terms of the kind of stupidity that pervades both the left and the right. There is mass widespread vilification of masturbation and sexual health. Sometimes it is based on "God wants you to wear a hat and not masturbate". Sometimes it is based on the idea that pornography is inherently demeaning to women (there is definitely some fucked up shit out there, but the 00s/10s saw the rise of "chick porn" and onlyfans et al have continued along with the focus that porn can be good for more than just the dudes who want to see some hairy taint pounding away at an inflamed vag because ludes are cheaper than lube).

And basically no influencers are going to stand up for it. Partially because porn is inherently competition for them (time you spend rubbing one out is time that could otherwise be spent falling asleep to ishowspeed reruns). And partially because they don't want to be vilified as "gooners" for... supporting sexual health.

And yeah. Once the framework is in place it becomes REAL easy to extend it towards the real targets: LGBTQ+ content.


As an aside, a couple months back I saw a REALLY wild thread on reddit about how men should sit down to pee and make sure to blot any urine with toilet paper. At first I thought it was just a bit but then I saw people lose their god damned minds at some (presumably) guy who explained that if you just give it a quick shake after you finish you are looking at a few drops, at worst, in your underpants and that is nothing. Definitely give it a rinse if you are about to engage in sexual activity but you aren't going to "reek of piss" all day.

They went insane and insisted it is closer to an ounce. This led me down a rabbit hole of checking people's profiles (bursts of insomnia is fun) to see this is a regular argument and more or less coming to the conclusion that, at least for a good many of these people, it is not just a complete lack of hygiene. Which got me googling (actually asking chatgpt and then verifying once I knew what terms to search for) and you know what is associated with (medical term) leaky dick syndrome?

That's right. Weak (again, medical term) schlong muscles. And you know the best way to exercise that? That's right! Kegels and ejaculation!

[–] shifty@leminal.space 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yes Fap November, let's goooo

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

you can also just give the gooch a lil squeeze after peeing to push out the remainder left in the pipes.

[–] dissentiate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Step 1: Become elected GOP cretin

Step 2: Repeatedly screech about a moral panic

Step 3: Legislate some shit law that is full of things that benefits whoever bribed you to get it to the floor

Step 4: Go back to diddling kids until you're outed publicly

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dissentiate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

As long as Step 4 doesn't happen, then yes. Repeatedly.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

I 100% agree with you. Fuck those fucking fuckers.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

Must be 18+ to watch porn

Must be 18- to watch porn while sitting on the lap of one of these legislators

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

So which Republicans own stock in VPNs?