this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10601 readers
2159 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that this farm has yet to fix any of the issues that caused the need for the cull in the first place demonstrates these people are not responsible enough to own those animals.

[–] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What exactly were those issues again? I was under the impression it was simply an abundance of caution to stop the spread of avian flu?

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

The stamping out policy is a major factor for the cull. The issues on the farm from what I remember were:

  • No quarantine zones for sick animals.
  • The Ostriches had access to shared resources with numerous wild animals like water sources.
  • The people on the farm were not wearing the proper protective gear when handling the animals.
  • The animals were not isolated from contact with visitors.
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

These ostriches have obviously survived their bout of flu, so I certainly hope someone is taking serum samples so we can at least research what immunity they gained to save other avians from flu outbreaks in the future. They may be worth more alive to science now...

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not okay that the right has prevented health measures from being enacted. They will continue to obstruct in the future.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

No disagreement there. But the time to stop an active flu spread situation has likely long passed on this farm, so I hope some good science can come out of it. (Which would be a bit ironic.)

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

so I certainly hope someone is taking serum samples so we can at least research what immunity they gained to save other avians from flu outbreaks in the future. They may be worth more alive to science now

There’s no shortage of means to reproduce what happened to these birds in a lab, with much more reliable controls. These birds are worth nothing to science now

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Aren't these birds safe now, since they have recovered from the flu? I mean, we don't quarantine people permanently after they recover from the flu because they're not infectious anymore. Insisting they still be culled at this point serves only to set an example that no one should try to skirt health laws simply by delaying (which may have some merit, but seems cruel to me). Still. I don't dispute that they should have been culled originally but the infectious window's "ship has sailed", has it not? So it seems a bit pointless to do now unless they actually still present a threat. If the farm owners delayed the culling by impeding it then penalize them, certainly with fines or jail time. But the animals don't need to suffer at this point do they?

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

(sorry for the late reply)

Aren’t these birds safe now, since they have recovered from the flu?

No

we don’t quarantine people permanently after they recover from the flu

Correct, and we also don’t have cull orders for humans.

Insisting they still be culled at this point serves only to set an example

Incorrect. This flock is compromised and is putting humans and other birds at risk

the infectious window’s “ship has sailed”, has it not?

No

But the animals don’t need to suffer at this point do they?

Right, they don’t need to suffer. They need to be either absolutely quarantined or destroyed. The owners are making zero effort to quarantine the birds, so it’s on them that the only option is culling.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't claim to be a veterinarian, doctor or flu expert, so if what you say is true and they are still a risk to spread avian flu to other animals then I agree, sadly they need to be culled. I was under the impression that the virus would have burned itself out among the flock if it were isolated all this time. But if they weren't being isolated all this time then that's not a valid premise.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

The fact that the farmers are still making zero effort to isolate these animals from humans and wildlife is the main reason the animals need to be culled as soon as possible