this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
63 points (97.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3449 readers
557 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Grew up and are friends with farmers. Can confirm that most of them are at least upper, upper middle class.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But they act like they are poor. We hike down at the river every morning with our dog's and in the way pass a lot of farms. They have RVs, boats, brand new quads or side-by-sides. But they will be the first to tell you how poor they are.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They're probably up to their eyeballs in debt, though.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They are definitely up to their eyeballs in debt. Farm equipment isn't cheap. Several of my uncles own a farm, it's a middle class existence but it's not a comfortable one.

(The 4x4s and trucks are farm equipment and the RV was from the 70s and used for my uncle's RAGBRAI team. No boats though.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

4x4s and trucks are farm equipment

Yeah the '79 dodge pick up with a missing fender is farm equipment, the 2024 ford 350 plastered in maga stickers that has never touched dirt, is not.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You know, m....

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

some years are better than others. on the good years, you can afford to buy things. when a few bad years hit, you can make nothing and end up paying what the average person makes in a year just to keep the farm running. could you afford to pay your job $50k a year just in the hope that next year it pays you something? could you do that for a couple years straight?

growing food is not very profitable, which is why subsidies exist in the first place. and since you depend on farmers to keep growing food instead of doing what's in their own self interest and growing cash crops, just so you don't starve to death , you better hope the government keeps farmers in business.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Farming is subsidized because of pork-barrel politics. They’re paid to grow corn that’s mostly thrown away. Sometimes they’re paid to not grow food.

And much of it is exported. How does feeding China help me? Why should “successful” businessmen get my tax dollars?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They aren’t your tax dollars, they’re our tax dollars. And seeing as those Chinese people you don’t like feeding are making everything else you consume, that’s how it fucking helps you.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Given that I'm in a maker state (not a taker state) and I don't get any tax credits (not married, no kids, not deducting mortgage interest, etc.) — I mean, it is my money. And great, we exported all our union manufacturing jobs to an authoritarian sweat shop.

Well, stop doing me favors. I don't want to subsidize soybeans for export to other countries to prop up authoritarian regimes.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Ok but taking China out of the equation here, I think their point is that it's part of the international trade system, which does benefit you. The US can't make everything, so being able to trade with other countries is a good thing. The tariffs putting a squeeze on that is an example of how interconnected and dependant we are on it.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I’m generally against nationalization. Farming should 100% be nationalized.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Farmers" is very broad....

Most farmland is owned by incredibly wealthy "farmers" who never step off pavement. They're just land hoarders and "investors".

However, most farmers (by number of individuals) are poor as fuck and usually have massive amounts of debt. When they go under or the kids move to a city, they sell to a "farmer".

It's a consolidation of a vital resource and we should all be concerned about the logical result when most of our food is grown by a handful of massive corporations.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most of your everything is owned by large corporations and your populace keeps voting for more.

You’re very right to be concerned.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most of your

Not sure where you're from. But I bet things aren't as great as you think

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Canada. And yeah, basically the same boat. A dingy attached to yours.