this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
171 points (83.0% liked)

Technology

76609 readers
2221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

they say it's worth it

Narrator: They did not.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've used it to explore some avenues without having to write a complete implementation. If the approach shows promise, then I go through the code and mostly rewrite it because the code it generates is terrible. I also use it if I don't care about the project I'm on. They want to "do test-driven development" while having poorly-defined requirements that constantly change on a whim while also setting unreasonable unit test coverage thresholds? Cool, I'll let the AI shit out a bunch of unit tests and waffle stomp it to satisfy your poorly thought out project requirements.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree with you on this. Let it handle things you don't care about and massage the output if necessary. Anything I do care about, I code myself, but will ask for help if I get stuck on something. I'm a novice programmer at best, 18/100 skill score.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That will make Taco very angry

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

This headline made me a little nauseous.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This topic is always twisted and based on some random bait surveys. Yes I'd commit AI code but mostly because that code does a test or implements some one off function that I read through anyway.

Do I enjoy baby sitting AI? Eh its a mix bag. Its great for writing tests and boilerplate and bootstrap you into real solutions but I dread any code base that claims their mostly written by cloude code. The AI is still incredibly stupid.

I think rubber duck is really the best feature of AI. I've been working remotely for over 20 years now and it's such a game changer just to bounce ideas and architecture designs with a chat bot. This feature should be revolutionary enough without the need for independent agents.

[–] AmanitaCaesarea@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 month ago

Gotta love how devs and engineers are supposed to be on the front lines of innovation and progression. But most of the it's just moaning and calling the next gen dumb. 15 years ago the current devs would be called dumb for using Frameworks amd how it's cheating since it's not self written. Do your part and educate and guide the next gen instead of complaining about tech evolving and being used.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›