this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
718 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7288 readers
1141 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This means that the proposal has once again been blocked. Wouldn't have expected that from our government TBH. Nice one!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 144 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some good fucking news.

See you guys next year to push it back again.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 45 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Maybe you should force referendums forbidding it and like mass warrantless surveillance including using data broker info without oversight.

Petition signatures demanding one, might take a bit but it is the only way to stop them. Short of electing better reps. Somehow that is not possible anywhere in the west on balance though.

You know what, you're right. Given the state of things we are far beyond just being reactive to that shit and have to proactively stop it. I'm sure there are already efforts in that direction, I'll look into it.

Or forcing the proponents of these reforms to reveal themselves. AFAIK they're proposing this crap to hit on everyone's privacy while keeping their own identities anonymous.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

EU Constitution with a proper Bill of Rights of some sort including not being spied on by the government, unless permitted by a court or something similar.

[–] Baked86@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

We already have it, they want to take it away ,The European Union recognizes privacy as a human right through two main legal instruments: the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights. The Charter's Article 7

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctre@feddit.org 72 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't get tired. They will absolutely come again.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is tiring and frustrating to know that it'll more than likely be back. At this point, we need a law that makes sure that this kind of surveillance is never legal. But the hurdles for that are unfortunately way higher than just getting a blocking minority.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Greddan@feddit.org 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sorry from Sweden! We have a spineless and stupid right wing government right now trying to be best buds with fascists. They just appointed an anti-abortion health minister from the tiny christian cultist party.

Unfortunately allowing for profit schools led to poor education about our history and economics so young people vote right wing and call themselves bourgeoisie now.

It's fucking embarrassing.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately our social democrats are in favor of chat control too, it was Ylva Johanssons idea to begin with.

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago

Yep. They've gotten stuck in the ratchet mechanism, moving ever further to the right as their opponent demands it. It's no longer the party my father voted for. They allowed the privately owned schools that will now be their demise, just so a couple of politicians could make a quick buck.

My vote has been with the Left for the last couple of elections. I think they've dealt with problem members (like the embarrassing Facebook conspiracy lady) admirably, instead of fiercely protecting them like other parties. But we'll see how it turns out by the next election.

What I do know is that another SD+M+whatever government will only lead us further down the same path as the U.S

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Hope you guys don’t develope an Americanized healthcare system

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melchior@feddit.org 61 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Something good coming from this government? I can not believe it.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was thinking: Something good finally came of DDR and Stasi.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

They also made great glassware

[–] jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I really didn't think this German government was going to oppose chat control. Well, apparently even the broken clock is right every once in a while.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently datenschutz is still a unifying issue

[–] jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In Germany we schΓΌtz Daten, not Menschen. At least that's what my German co-worker used to say during our project to become GDPR compliant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

The EU made some great decisions. Chat control is NOT one of them.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait huh? That is unexpected

[–] eigenspace@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If you were paying attention it shouldn't be surprising. Privacy is the sort of thing that Germans generally get very worked up about.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I am german i know how high it is in germany. BUT german politicians are also constantly pushing for chat control. Especially the ruling partys SPD, CDU and CSU.

Axel Voss, the idea and guy behind article 13 SPD minister presidents and MPs constantly advocate and want chat control So the CDU and CSU "to controll and protect against pedos and terrorists"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] genfood@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

Yes, but…. Our government don’t care about what the people in Germany want. Nit even the people in Germany care about what the people in Germany want…

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But weren’t they undecided at first?

They were undecided at first

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

Yet again in recent history Germany saves us from our incompetent wannabe fascist leaders.

[–] oplkill@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Small victory for now

[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dont like the current german goverment but in this case they did the right thing. Good on them.

[–] visnae@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You mean the left thing, because parties on the right usually like surveillance 🀣

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The German Afd was against it though. They may be nazi scum, but I can't shit on them on this particular topic.

[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

I am 100% sure that the fascists will implement stuff way way worse once they manage to get into power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Yay Deutschland! πŸ’ͺ

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

German politicians are actually pulling some Ws. Even vdL made some good moves last week.

Good to see, maybe we'll get somewhere.

[–] emmanuel_car@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, not happy about the move to make medicinal cannabis more restrictive, but this is a win at least.

[–] Ontimp@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago
[–] Baked86@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Neutral shouldn't be in the same as against imo.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[–] 100@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i got the impression that germans dont like the government snooping on them (stasi...) so they would never support these proposals in the first place?

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Generally yes, there's always a lot of opposition to these kind of proposals in Germany. But the biggest party in power right now is known for its many attempts to massively increase surveillance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I sometimes wonder if there's something we could be getting behind to tip the scales the other way. It would be wonderful not to have to wait for this to show its ugly head again and instead have the pro-surveilance people on their heels trying to stop a pro-privacy movement.

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actively not supporting it or just not issuing any statement?

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actively not supporting it, at least in its current iteration.

at least in its current iteration.

That's the important part here.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί