this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
833 points (99.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7741 readers
460 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35684522

Despite his support for Trump, Ragland has become increasingly vocal about the need for immediate trade resolution. “We desperately need to get something rectified quickly with China, our biggest export customer,” he told CNN. “We wanna encourage the administration to get a proactive trade deal done.”

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Got what you voted for. It’s ok, they have insurance.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does their insurance cover acts of megalomania? Because I somehow doubt that.

Most policies have a guarantee in yield/minimum money made. It will cover costs, but they won’t profit much if that happens…. And if they are farmers that are already struggling, then that will put them over the edge.. this shit is wild.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

All I have to say is get fucked loser

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

During Trump's last term when he fucked over soybean growers, at least locally in my rural community, the soybeans didn't go to waste. They didn't rot in the fields or in storage. However, farmers ended up having to sell for way less than normal, and basically they didn't make any profit (many even saw losses) that year.

This issue with this year, again I can only speak to my area, is that by the time Trump was elected, most people would have already placed their orders for seed and the specific chemicals/supplies they needed for soy, so they're on the hook for it. They would have been facing the decision to take a sure loss (ex: if they didn't plant the soy they've already purchased and/or if they had to go procure some other crop seed and related supplies) OR they could go ahead as planned with the soy and hope for the best.

Where I live, most farmers aren't "soy farmers", they're just farmers. They rotate crops from year to year on a pretty rigid schedule, so one year it's soy, next might be corn, grains following that, then cover crop / hay. So, they better hope the weather holds up next year for whatever crop they were planning because I doubt a lot of them will be able to tolerate multiple years of essentially no profit.

[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Arrogant dickheads.

China has reached the point it can afford to say no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Seen ✓✓

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Hope they starve to death on a bed of rotting soy

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Grab yer pitchforks n torches, frankenorange must die

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Honestly might be really nice if we can decrease agricultural land usage. Might even cut back on red meat importing.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago

If the Supreme Court won’t issue a verdict, maybe, just maybe, the people who produce our food will.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Too bad there isn't a local population that could use the food. But if Americans can't afford it on their own, and with farmer's federal subsidies cut, farmers aren't about to sell cheaply or give it away locally.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›