this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
1364 points (99.2% liked)

People Twitter

8158 readers
2315 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This is a world-building element of Heinlein’s posthumous novel, For Us the Living, where UBI allows people to do art or other low-pay trades. The UBI system in the novel enables people who don’t want to work, are tired of work, or who aren’t good at working, to live and pursue what does make them happy since their livelihood doesn’t rely on working a job. Of course, Heinlein has some libertarian nonsense to harp on in the book, but it’s wild just how long we’ve known that there is enough to take care of us all and that working to live is a detriment individually and collectively.

[–] brem@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Whoever said this obviously doesn't have a financial backer to develop acrylic paint in easy to eat tubes (specifically in yellow)

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

the money also gets them famous

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Just like most things. No not everyone is a creative or able to be happy doing creative things. And when you start talking about groups in the tens or hundreds of millions even small percentages become significant.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The vast, vast majority of artists do it as a job to survive and not for fun though.

It can certainly be a hobby that is done for fun with no time constraints, where you can just make whatever you please, but it can also be stressful, soul-sucking necessity once money gets involved.

[–] meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Can confirm. I've gone full-time gigging musician. Don't get me wrong, I chose this path after exhausting all other options because it's the only career I can stomach, but when you make your hobby your job, your hobby becomes your job.

I've managed to pay rent and bills, but I still got credit card debt from the beginning when I was really scraping by. Every month feels like I'm unemployed until I get saved by a big gig, but it is quite terrifying still.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I would consider many of the construction trades a form of art, and thats certainly still a job. Art is more a way of doing something than a specific action in my opinion. You can also create art in a way thats not expressive, which would mean the person making it might not be an artist.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay? What about all those billionaires destroying the world? Guess they must be the exceptions...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

It seems to me like being able to choose to be an artist when rent is due IS what being Privileged means. Yeah, a lot more people probably would choose to express themselves over being a wage slave.

I'm not even sure what this post is trying to convey. Is there a definition of Privilege that doesn't include having opportunities that a lot of other people don't have?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I used to be the kind of optimist that would largely agree with this post. But in the past decade I've seen the truth. Most people are profoundly uncurious and uncreative, even when encouraged to be.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

Nope. ^1^

    1. I've met artists.
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›