this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
514 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

74901 readers
2284 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh but what if it was in 3D!

Remember that time?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well the good thing is info storage cost and processing power tends to increase over time, so that’s one side of their argument handled; and things tend to keep progressing technologically over time, so I’d assume 8k would eventually replace 4k, and so on and so on; but the human eye does have a limit to what it can resolve- so at some point 2d images will probably just be as good as we need them to be

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Nobody will ever need an 8K TV, but 8K content would be nice on a (purely theoretical atm) pleasant to use head mounted display, one day

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And of course the comment section with "16k around the coner, progress doesn't stop".

I can not tell the improvement since 1080P. Are these TVs letting us see into the future?

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'll take one! Well, two really. One large one for TV/media viewing and one to replace my 43" 4k monitor. Quadrupling the resolution on that would be amazing.

The difference would be minimal on the media screen, TBH, but Ive seen them in person and can tell the difference. It's just not a big enough difference to warrant replacing what I have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

I would love to have an 8K TV or monitor if I had an internet connection up to the task and enough content in 8K to make it worth it, or If I had a PC powerful enough to run games smoothly in that resolution.

I think it's silly to say 'nobody wants this' when the infrastructure for it isn't even close to adequate.

I will admit that there is diminishing returns now, going from 4K to 8K was less impressive than FHD to 4K and I imagine that 8K will probably be where it stops, at least for anything that can reasonably fit in a house.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

LASIK actually made a huge difference in being able to appreciate the sharpness of 4K, but I doubt 8K is as big a leap.

4k is nice but at 1440p the diminishing returns are pretty obvious doubt 8k is somehow going to change that

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, and 640kb RAM Ought to be Enough for Anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arararagi@ani.social 4 points 3 days ago

2tb drives aren't as cheap as I would hope

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I want one but my GPU can't drive games at 8k and 100+ FPS. Also there's no media for it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›