this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
37 points (93.0% liked)

politics

25624 readers
2835 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35385827

The files are in a google drive here

The House of Representatives Oversight Committee published 33,295 pages, including flight logs, jail surveillance video, court filings, audio recordings and emails.

But Republicans and Democrats alike said the files contained little new information and it is unclear if the justice department is withholding other Epstein records.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh look, the actual distraction, posted like 30 times as well. We committed a war crime in international waters yesterday.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please link whatever you are referring to. I ain't seen shit today.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand the frustration, but having imagery or any irrefutable proof that the current president is a child molester, is one of the best attack vectors we have. It’s one both sides of politics are agreeing on.

Unfortunately for these 11 ppl, their death will be forgotten in the media cycle, while the Epstein saga is hanging around his neck and slowing him down and not going anywhere.

Without impeachment or the SC holding him to account, the Epstein files (and him being in it) and the Musk aided election fraud are two attack vectors with the highest probability to bring him down.

That’s why I’m doing this and why I don’t think Epstein is a distraction, rather is what he wants distraction from.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not one piece of information released was not already released. They don’t fucking care and won’t stop supporting him over this. If there were any evidence of wrongdoing by Trunp in those files, then the republicans would not be releasing them. Representative Luna even spilled the beans when she tweeted that with this release they will avoid having the vote on obtaining other materials. It’s all a con job.

If you can to one single piece of information that is released in these 33,000 pages that is new, I would love to see it. If anything, the release of these files is going to get the republicans to say ‘see no Trump, but here is a flight log with Bill Clinton on it.’ Like we didn’t already fucking know.

This entire charade is obvious, and is designed to get the ‘surely this time there will be consequences’ crowd to think they are making progress, which they are not.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I haven’t looked through all 30k+ pages, and you’re probably right there’s nothing new. But they were forced to do this con move, or they would not have. And the choice of the con move is also adding to the mounting suspicion that this is a very well guarded piece of information and therefore must be damning.

I would not describe myself as an optimist, but the GOP being forced to keep this story alive is a win. Not a big one, but they are not managing to burry this.

Also note: we don’t need the official release. We just need one patriotic or just human with a moral compass who has seen the files and being sick of not being able to sleep for weeks since seeing it, to become a whistleblower and leak it.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The problem is that none of those pages contain novel content.

They were pretty much all already available from various sources. This is 100% a distraction. As I posted elsewhere recently, this is an extremely common legal defense tactic employed by rich people and corporations: inundate the plaintiff’s counsel with metric fuckloads of bullshit. It serves to confuse the matter, delay discovery of important data, and also makes it a lot more difficult to quickly determine that critical data may be missing.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

See my other comments in the other thread