When fascists attempt to kill democracy, those who support democracy need to act in kind toward the fascists.
Political Memes
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
... military resistance against dictatorships does not strike them where they are weakest, but rather where they are strongest. By choosing to compete in the areas of military forces, supplies of ammunition, weapons technology, and the like, resistance movements tend to put themselves at a distinct disadvantage. Dictatorships will almost always be able to muster superior resources in these areas.
From Dictatorship to Democracy (Gene Sharp)
While I agree with the sentiment, I think the point above illustrates why we must understand how we will resist.
“Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me'.” ― George Orwell Violence is necessary.
Non violent resistance is not the same as apathy or acceptance. It is also a proven method for change and removing violent regimes. Not because the people in power have a change of heart but because the people that enforce their power do.
You can always try reading the book for yourself. I just started it.
https://annas-archive.org/md5/5a32e1e61b5484aeae129dc4d1f68eab
I also have a proven method of change, the same we used against the Nazis, the same we will use again and again until there are No More Nazis.
Interesting quote sick whose who refuse to fight until it's too late end up trapped in situations where their only method of fighting is non-violent resistance. They literally slide into it because it's the only form of resistance they are comfortable with. In order to resist a dictatorship, they need to become part of it, and letting it happen accomplishes that goal. It's weirdly circular. Or I'm more high than I think.
Non violent resistance is simply about reducing the death and bloodshed of the resisters. It is not acceptance or compliance.
It's going to depend on the situation what type of resistance is required. However, unless the resistance has on its side a trained military that can overpower or outwit the regime's abundant military force. How will it effectively end that regime through violence? If guerrilla warfare is used then narratives can be used to gain support for the regime, both domestically and internationally.
Non violent resistance gives us another path to democracy. Also, it avoids the power struggle that sometimes occurs when a regime is defeated by violent means.
It's going to take a long time for Americans to understand and accept what they actually need to do to protect it and by then, the cost may be more than they are willing to pay.
Americans are unwilling to pay any cost that actually requires them to do something, on average at least. Some of us though are willing to start preparing ourselves for what must be done.
If you can't vote then you don't pay taxes. Our ancestors started a war about NO taxation without representation.
Oh no, no, you can vote, just make it through the American Ninja Warrior of voting bureaucracy, easy! Also taxation without representation doesn't necessarily mean you voted for your representative, only that there is someone who represents you. When a dem or repub is votes it o office, they represent their district, not just their voters. Not functionally, of course, symbolically and that's legally good enough.
Several Republican state congressmen have filled a lawsuit against the 'new' voting laws in Michigan. Due to a public initiative, we have universal registration, no-excuse absentee voting, and a non-partisan redistricting committee to draw congressional districts.
Republicans are mad about all those things, and are arguing that the public initiative took away the state legislature's sole right to make election laws.