this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
558 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I've been saying that for a couple of years now. They started fucking with third party ink at least a year ago

[โ€“] ninjaturtle@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Have to keep things offline and outdated nowadays ๐Ÿซค to prevent things like this happening.

[โ€“] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly, that's not a terrible idea in general. Like, if you have an Internet-connected device, you have a hook onto your network that someone can exploit down the line, including -- as Rossman points out -- making it function differently than it did at the time of your purchase in ways that you may not like. And even if you trust the manufacturer, that doesn't mean that someone cannot acquire them and then exploit that hook.

Kind of a problem with apps and other software too. Even open-source software, like the xz attack -- the xz package itself was fine, but you had someone, probably a country, intentionally target and try to seize control of an open-source project to exploit the trust that the open-source project had built up. I understand that it's also been a concern with even browser extensions.

The right to push updates to an Internet-connected device, unfortunately, has value. And there are people who will try to figure out ways to take advantage of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Old printers on ebay are going to be the new game, until we start seeing kickstarter flooded with new printer companies.

[โ€“] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want to agree, but has there ever been a case of the free market saving itself?

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] St0ner@lemmy.wtf 12 points 1 week ago

enshitification of technological things continues..

[โ€“] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 10 points 1 week ago

The last bid I reviewed for a new office recommended Brother printers (woot) but the color laser had toner lock-in. I recommended an alternative and the owner agreed.

Too bad these companies won't know about the products they don't sell because of this crap.

[โ€“] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Welp, I guess that pen plotter I built last year is going to be my full time printer

[โ€“] Opisek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Not sure if I got the update yet, but I'm banning my printer from accessing the internet right now.

[โ€“] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Glad I've got an Brother laser that has no network connectivity.

[โ€“] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Strictly-speaking, in this case, it's not the ability to be network-connected that's at issue, but rather the ability to push updates to firmware.

I don't know what type of computer you have it connected to, but Linux has a system that will automatically update firmware on USB-attached devices if the attached Linux computer is Internet-connected.

$ sudo fwupdtool get-devices

Will show you a list of managed devices.

I'm sure that Windows and MacOS have comparable schemes.

On Linux, I'm sure that you can blacklist a device for updates.

I'd guess that it's possible to get one of those dedicated USB print servers. Those probably don't support updating firmware on an attached printer. I might have some questions as to how much I'd trust a no-name one of those on my network itself, but...

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have a Brother MFC-9340CDW that I salvaged from work last year; we replaced it because it kept getting a ghost "paper jam" every time you tried to print something. Turns out the cause is an $18 board that's known to fail. Scanner still works fine though, strangely.

I also have a Kyocera FS-3900DN b&w laser printer from 2006...or somewhere around there. It does the thing, and can even be managed with a CUPS server since it has 10/100 networking.

Now to figure out how to disable automatic firmware updates on the Brother ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are there actually any good printers? I would pay more for the printer itself if you just don't try and scam me afterwards. It feels like a hopeless space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I've always promoted commercial inktank printers for people who do a lot of printing, and people always mentioned Brother as a response, but tbh I've never really hopped on the bandwagon to shill for any particular company.

Just a good commercial inktank printer. A regular printer with all the bells and whistles is going to cost you like $100 and $45 for each ink pack you buy, you might as well just spend $450 on a printer, write it off as home office expense, and call it good.

[โ€“] Dirk@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Can't watch right now, but is there a list of affected devices?

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ