this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

6835 readers
164 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Taking bets on the number of useful contributors about to tank.

[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

I'll take the other side!

[–] nous@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From their blog post:

Finally, subjectively, C++ isn’t drawing in the crowds. We have never had a lot of C++ contributors. Over the 11 years fish used C++, only 17 people have at least 10 commits to the C++ code. We also don’t know a lot of people who would love to work on a C++ codebase in their free time.

Hard to tank when you don't have many to begin with. Rust is far nicer to new users to contribute to then old C++ code. Which can be seen in their github - in the last 24 months 16 people have contributed more then 10 commits. Which is during the conversion period - I dont expect that many of those to be C++ contributions. So rust does not seem to have hurt their contributions at all and in fact looks to have helped.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps it depends on what people are used to. I use C++ regularly and I find rust syntax much too painful to look at.

[–] StrikeForceZero@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Rust was painful to look at until I started using it for more than 6 or so months