Ok, so here's what I want to know:
If they cut those call centre jobs in half, and the current rate of calls answered is only 5%, what was it before? 100% 10%?
Because that would make a huge difference to how we view this problem. If 3000 more people only resulted in 10% of calls being taken, maybe it was better to save that money (logically, not ethically).
But if nearly all calls were taken with the previous levels of staffing, then they need to bring those people back ASAP.