this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
464 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

9249 readers
2332 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Came here to make sure this had been posted already. Thank you for doing your duty.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The planet with finite resources is more than enough to sustain every living person on the planet and probably more. The problem is that those limited resources are being horded and guarded by a handful of people.

Not if some of those resources are things like oil. It's gonna run out eventually.

But like, yes, in principle there's plenty of resources, especially as the main source of energy is the sun. But there won't be if that resource usage grows infinitely, even if people stop hoarding. It's going to become a problem eventually no matter what, unless the endless pursuit of growth ends

[–] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 days ago

Just buy more planets. Ez fix

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 3 days ago

I know this one! It goes in the square hole!

[–] Una@europe.pub 11 points 3 days ago

Problem is, this is spherical hole, everyone knows everything goes into square hole

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But the main resource (money) is just an imaginary thing that can be created at will

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It was probably better when money was literal precious metals since those are finite. Now that money is imaginary it's exponentially easier for the lizard folk to hoard massive amount of "money."

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago
[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

An economy based on endless growth is UNSUSTAINABLE

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago

It's imperative the ~~cylinder~~ square peg remains unharmed

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Really the bottle neck currently is not that finite resources are drying up, it's that distribution and refinement of those resources isn't fast and organized enough to be where they need to be when they need to be there in the state they need to be in. But if that supply chain were completely effortlessly smooth, it would still come to a grinding halt as soon as non-renewable resources without viable alternatives run out, which would take less time with the smoother supply chain.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

#Space

The Final Frontier.

These are the Voyages of HCS Enterprise, her continuing mission, to facilitate trade and bring home spices from the Skillion Verge. To boldly go, where no Englishman has gone before!

East India Company: The Next Generation

[–] ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I hate this argument, like yeah it is right, but what is the limit? If we have 8bi people, and it can hold a few trillion, we could still grow a incomprehensible ammount.

(No, climate change doesn't show we hit the limit, there is more than one limit, and it shows the limit of carbon emissions, growth doesn't require carbon)

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

A fine point if anyone in control of the unlimited growth we're accounting for it in any meaningful way.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

But we'll still need to switch to communism before we hit a few trillion in population.

But your framing of the issue, and the post, miss one of the key points of the infinite growth paradox - the productive capacity of the human workforce is also limited. And we're beginning to hit that limit. 100 years ago, the average household worked 40 hours a week at a factory with a wife at home to do chores. Today, the average household works 80 hours a week at an office and does chores on weekends. Where is all that extra labour value going? Into the pockets of billionaires. And every year, the billionaires expect more profits than the year before.

Everyone is burnt out and most people will never own a house. We're approaching the limit of what workers can give to Capital. The system will assuredly fall when we hit the absolute of that limit, and Capital is trying to get AGI running before then so that capitalism doesn't have to end when that limit is reached.

I think the limit depends on the exact item/market. Which is a nuance, and this is the Internet, nuance isn't allowed here.