this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
606 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

74359 readers
3078 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/34873574

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

That would be totally unenforceable, imo.

[–] dzajew@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago

I'm gonna modify Springer's websites so hard, they're gonna resemble a Picasso's painting

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Great, but how could they possibly enforce it? It's infeasible.

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

As long as they can reduce the adblock usage, it is a win for them. 100% success is not the goal. Right now there is nothing stopping everyone from using some sort of adblocker (0% revenue is possible actually), which must be scary.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Will they sue Dillo next, because it looks like this there? 👉👈🥹

collapsed inline media

Btw, they lost in this already what, 7 times?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Eh, next try (Nr. 7? 8?) of Axel Springer, a tabloid that wanted to declare their site as a protected piece of art you aren't allowed to modify (block stuff).

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

maybe in the future a service offers a flat monthly fee to not have any ads and distributes the money to all of the content platforms that would otherwise show ads. basically it's like a little government taxing users and giving the money to the capital owning class all over again

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Another way to subsidize a very small handful of extremely large businesses that are already richer than some countries, and outright kill small actors? Sign me up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devilish666@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how much money Google bribing Germany to make it happened ?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Bribing Merz*

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At what point do we just redo the web? I'm thinking Gemini but with more geo cities

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Funny how this thread isn't over-run with copyright shills standing up for the poor journalists. Maybe once the law needs to be changed?

Just take your internet connected devices into your back yard and burn them all. Might as well take preemptive action before the internet is killed off.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

With the recent insults to privacy (including E2E encryption) and the pro-corporate legislation, has Germany lost its way? Seems like newer generations are forgetting the lived experience of the Stasi. Also, I feel that pro-tenant legislation is at risk.

Update: the top comment is the best; don’t read my bullshit.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›