this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
907 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

8134 readers
889 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 189 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] casmael@mander.xyz 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah this one or the bicycle meme

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

He’s not getting hurt like in the bicycle meme though, just hurting others.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 155 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

I can walk into a bank today with a mortgage cheaper than rent, and I’ll be denied cause I don’t make enough money, explain that logic to me.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 96 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Landlords don't care if your rent is sustainable for you in the long term. They have nothing to lose if at one point you can't afford it anymore, someone else will.

Banks on the other hand care very much if you'll be able to pay your loan in full. Even with the house as collateral, it's much better for them if you just paid your loan instead of them having to deal with all that.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

"they get the house if you don't pay" really isn't so great after you've look at what they actually get for those houses.

Generally, people don't get foreclosed on when their house looks super fancy and well maintained.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Also debt is an asset for banks. Having people in debt for 30 years is better than having people in debt for 10 years and then selling their house.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They only get to force the sale of the house to recoup their loan, you get to keep the extra from the sale. House sells for $300k, you owed $250k you walk away with $50k and the bank gets their money back.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

But on auction, the bid is usually FAR below the normal asking price.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If something were to happen, and you couldn't make rent, you might get evicted, which would be inconvenient.

If something were to happen, and you couldn't make the mortgage, the bank might lose money, which is unconscionable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Not sure if you're in America but credit scores are some rigged ass bs. What do you mean paying off a loan made my score lower?? I have more disposable income!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 79 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

A) This is a hoax account

B) You can still get cheaper housing if you don't live in the whitest, red-lined-ass, suburban enclaves in your state

C) Even then, it doesn't matter, because landlords primarily benefit from very low borrowing costs rather than low housing costs. A $300k house was still functionally unaffordable to anyone earning $45k/year, unless your credit score got you one of those sweet sub-3% ZIRP era loans. Renting was effectively paying a vig to a guy with a better interest rate than you.

D) ZIRP also flooded the market with the excess cash that made $300k basic bitch housing possible. And then turned those $300k homes into $600k homes 15 years later.

E) Build Public Housing

F) And municipal mass transit, so you don't have to sit in traffic for a hour every day

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a hoax account

I hope so. The dissonance and lack of self-awareness in the post was so profound, my head is still ringing.

[–] Raptorox@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

I saw quite a few Chase Passive Income posts and all of them feel like satire

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 75 points 3 weeks ago (24 children)

This isn't small timers, it's corporations buying up all of the housing, building only "luxury" apartments and price fixing the fuck out of the rent.

Then they spout "Trickle Down Housing" where the "luxury" apartments will be available in 30 years.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago

The guy said "these houses, ...each" so he could own the whole area and jack up the rents, not be a small timer. But yeah, it's not the person renting out Grandma's old place to help pay for her nursing home.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

The fact that we have to ask this is the point I think.. Hilarious post btw! 🤣

[–] ShawiniganHandshake@sh.itjust.works 68 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Lots of people seem to be missing this - Chase Passive Income is a satirical account.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know how they could miss that. It is very clearly a satirical post. No rich people are either that self aware or interested in outing themselves as greedy useless pieces of shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (32 children)

This is the, “If I don’t do it, someone else will,” argument. Which is true.

There is always all least one other ass hole out there.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Yes, this is a satire account, but I've heard the exact same crap from so-called "small landlords" who think clearly the problem is someone else.

Every small contributor that makes up the bulk of the problem thinks the REAL problem is the one that's bigger than them and they're the small potatoes, or the good one.

This applies to EVERYTHING. Not just property.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

There should be nothing wrong with owning multiple houses. But your property tax should be adjusted on every house you own depending on the number of houses that own. It should be completely cost prohibitive at a certain point to own more than 2 or 3 homes. It should kick in after a year or two, so that it gives people more than enough time to purchase a new home, fix it up or renovate, and then time to sell the previous house. Owning houses shouldn't be a profit-making venture.

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Societal problems should be solved by the government, not by individual actions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

That's very nice. Now please face the wall.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem tellimg the country to… remove him? Thats a first

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED NEXT!!!

[–] JokeDeity@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

This has to be satire. TELL ME IT'S SATIRE!

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

im just waiting on 3d printed houses to become cheaper (than it already is now) and mainstream.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Those can be an alternative, but aren't great for longevity. They're almost always essentially entirely concrete, which means if you want to get to, say, a pipe in the wall, be ready to smash through rock and then have to fill in a vertical hole in the wall with concrete again. This weakens structural integrity over time any time you've gotta do repairs, and makes them more expensive to do.

The more sane alternative for most people will be prefab housing, where either the entire house is sent in as either a single prefab unit, or a unit for each room that's simply connected and stacked, or where just each wall is a pre-made unit that's then assembled. The latter has become much more common in construction already, and the former is growing market share rapidly right now, to the point you can, right now, literally order a prefab house from Amazon.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›