this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)

Europe

5042 readers
2112 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Frist test flight, which is expected to explode anyways.

But let's hope, that we are heading towards a good European satellite delivery method.

Also, there are several other European companies building rockets. Might want to take a look at them, too.

Edit

The countdown has begun for the test flight of the Spectrum rocket from Bavarian start-up Isar Aerospace. If nothing else intervenes, it should take off within a time window of 12.30 to 15.30, according to the company. However, this is not yet certain, as the countdown before a rocket launch is often stopped or even aborted - possible reasons include safety concerns or the weather.

According to Isar Aerospace, the aim of the test flight is to gather as much data and as much experience as possible. The possibility of the rocket reaching orbit is largely ruled out. In the past, no company has ever managed to get its first rocket into orbit, a spokeswoman emphasized in advance. β€œThe rocket may explode, that is even likely during the test flight,” she said. ”30 seconds would already be a great success.”

The next rockets are already in production

If the test flight goes well, things could continue relatively quickly. Rockets two and three are already in production, according to the spokeswoman. β€œHow quickly they will be on the launchpad also depends on the results of the first test flight - and whether only software or hardware adjustments need to be made. In any case, our goal is to be back on the launch pad as quickly as possible.”

The Spectrum rocket is 28 meters long and has a diameter of 2 meters; depending on which orbit it is aiming for, the commercial load it can carry - known as payload in space jargon - is 700 to 1000 kilos. According to current plans, it will already be used by satellites on the second flight.

The launch of the test rocket from Norway will be a double premiere: not only the first flight for Isar Aerospace, but also the first launch of an orbital launch vehicle in continental Europe.

Up to 40 rockets per year

Isar Aerospace develops launchers for the transportation of satellites into orbit. Last year, even India launched more rockets than Europe. One reason for this is the many years of delays in the development of the Ariane 6 launcher.

Isar Aerospace's vision for the future is to build up to 40 launch vehicles per year. The start-up has raised more than 400 million euros in capital to date. The Nato Innovation Fund, a venture capital fund supported by 24 Nato states, also participated in the latest financing round.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The launch is scrubbed due to weather. They will try to figure a new launch window.

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Damn. Would have loved to see it skyrocket.

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

People are monitoring the launch over at https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=62618
And there's a person attempting to live-stream the launch at https://www.twitch.tv/realairgel (stream will start just before launch)

Launch is supposed to happen about an hour from now.

[–] Regdok@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sadly scrubbed for today. Not surprising as it has been really windy here in VesterΓ₯len the past few days (I live in a neighbouring town, and it's been a little uncomfortable even just driving over bridges in cars).

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@SrMono@feddit.org When you submit non-English posts, please provide a readable (machine) translation too.

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Changed it as requested, but with translations being available in modern browsers this seems just to be a tedious chore with almost no use. Will keep me from posting articles in future.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank you!

As to your criticism: Not everyone uses a browser with translations, especially on mobile where you often can't install add-ons either. And not everything survives machine translation. We recently had a Polish post with the term "anti-Musk alliance" in it. DeepL translated that into English as "anti-Muslim alliance", while Firefox came up with "anti-muscle alliance". Kind of a big difference, hence I think the rule still makes sense.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why not make it reusable though? If you go and design a rocket from scratch today, that seems a must to me. It doesn't need to be a star ship competitor, but at least try to be on par with Falcons, New Shepherds etc...

[–] llothar@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

It will be first ever orbital launch from European soil, and first ever orbital launch for the company. I think non reusable is good enough for now.

[–] vollkorntomate@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The second generation of Spectrum will be larger and could potentially be reusable. As I understand this, the current version is simply too weak for all the extra components that reusability requires.

There are other companies tasked with the development of reusable rockets for ESA, though.

https://europeanspaceflight.com/esa-selects-four-companies-to-develop-reusable-rocket-technology/

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Hm, so Ariane is actually hoping to tests their first reusable prototype this year, but given it's Ariane, I'll hold my expectations for now. Isars second rocket is supposed to be bigger, but not clearly stated as being reusable at this point... Guess we'll see

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the rocket equation is brutal.
A rocket is almost entirely fuel some structure and a minuscule amount of payload. If you want to save fuel for for relanding you need to take less payload or accept a lower orbit.

If we look at Falcon 9, the payload to geostationary transfer orbit^* goes from 8,300 kg when expended, to 5,500 kg when landing on a barge or 3,500 kg when landing on the launch site.

* meaning the payload needs an additional stage to enter geostationary orbit

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

I'm aware, still throwing away you rocket every time is neither financially nor ecologically sustainable. The fact that SpaceX has managed to lower the cost per kilo to orbit that much proves it

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

I guess there are advantages and disadvantages of re-usable rockets. This one might be easier and can be fast tracked to have solution after all. I stumbled over an article talking about SpaceX re-usability is a reason for economic problems - cannot remember where though.